EPISTLES ON THE ARIAN HERESY AND THE DEPOSITION OF ARIUS. I.--TO ALEXANDER,
BISHOP OF THE CITY OF CONSTANTINOPLE
EPISTLES(1) ON THE ARIAN HERESY AND THE DEPOSITION OF ARIUS.
I.--TO ALEXANDER, BISHOP OF THE CITY OF CONSTANTINOPLE.
To the most reverend and like-minded brother, Alexander, Alexander sends
greeting in the Lord;
1. THE ambitious and avaricious will of wicked men is always wont to lay
snares against those churches which seem greater, by various pretexts attacking
the ecclesiastical piety of such. For incited by the devil who works in them,
to the lust of that which is set before them, and throwing away all religious
scruples, they trample under foot the fear of the judgment of God. Concerning
which things, I who suffer, have thought it necessary to show to your piety, in
order that you may be aware of such men, lest any of them presume to set foot in
your dioceses, whether by themselves or by others; for these sorcerers know how
to use hypocrisy to carry out their fraud; and to employ letters composed and
dressed out with lies, which are able to deceive a man who is intent upon a
simple and sincere faith. Arius, therefore, and Achilles,(2) having lately entered
into a conspiracy, emulating the ambition of Colluthus, have turned out far
worse than he. For Colluthus, indeed, who reprehends these very men, found some
pretext for his evil purpose; but these, beholding his(3) battering of Christ,
endured no longer to be subject to the Church; but building for themselves dens
of thieves, they hold their assemblies in them unceasingly, night and day
directing their calumnies against Christ and against us. For since they call in
question all pious and apostolical doctrine, after the manner of the Jews, they
have constructed a workshop for contending against Christ, denying the Godhead of
our Saviour, and preaching that He is only the equal of all others. And having
collected all the passages which speak of His plan of salvation and His
humiliation for our sakes, they endeavour from these to collect the preaching of their
impiety, ignoring altogether the passages in which His eternal Godhead and
unutterable glory with the Father is set forth. Since, therefore, they back up the
impious opinion concerning Christ, which is held by the Jews and Greeks, in
every possible way they strive to gain their approval; busying themselves about
all those things which they are wont to deride in us, and daily stirring up
against us seditions and persecutions. And now, indeed, they drag us before the
tribunals of the judges, by intercourse with silly and disorderly women, whom they
have led into error; at another time they cast opprobrium and infamy upon the
Christian religion, their young maidens disgracefully wandering about every
village and street. Nay, even Christ's indivisible tunic, which His executioners
were unwilling to divide, these wretches have dared to rend.(4)
2. And we, indeed, though we discovered rather late, on account of their
concealment, their manner of life, and their unholy attempts, by the common
suffrage of all have s cast them forth from the congregation of the Church which
adores the Godhead of Christ. But they, running hither and thither against us,
have begun to betake themselves to our colleagues who are of the same mind with
us; in appearance, indeed, pretending to seek for peace and concord, but in
reality seeking to draw over some of them by fair words to their own diseases,
asking long wordy letters from them, in order that reading these to the men whom
they have deceived, they may make them impenitent in the errors into which they
have fallen, and obdurate in impiety, as if they had bishops thinking the same
thing and siding with them. Moreover, the things which amongst us they have
wrongly taught and done, and on account of which they have been expelled by us,
they do not at all confess to them, but they either pass them over in silence, or
throwing a veil over them, by feigned words and writings they deceive them.
Concealing, therefore, their pestilent doctrine by their specious and flattering
discourse, they circumvent the more simple-minded and such as are open to fraud,
nor do they spare in the meanwhile to traduce our piety to all. Hence it comes
to pass that some, subscribing their letters, receive them into the Church,
although in my opinion the greatest guilt lies upon those ministers who venture
to do this; because not only does the apostolic rule not allow of it, bat the
working of the devil in these men against Christ is by this means more strongly
kindled. Wherefore without delay, brethren beloved, I have stirred myself up to
show you the faithlessness of these men who say that there was a time when the
Son of God was not; and that He who was not before, came into existence
afterwards, becoming such, when at length He was made, even as every man is wont to be
born. For, they say, God made all things from things which are not,
comprehending even the Son of God in the creation of all things rational and irrational.
To which things they add as a consequence, that He is of mutable nature, and
capable both of virtue and vice. And this hypothesis being once assumed, that
He is "from things which are not," they overturn the sacred writings concerning
His eternity, which signify the immutability and the Godhead of Wisdom and the
Word, which are Christ.
3. We, therefore, say these wicked men, can also be the sons of God even
as He. For it is written, "I have nourished and brought up children."(1) But
when what follows was objected to them, "and they have rebelled against me," which
indeed is not applicable to the nature of the Saviour, who is of an immutable
nature; they, throwing off all religious reverence, say that God, since He
foreknew and had foreseen that His Son would not rebel against Him, chose Him from
all. For He did not choose Him as having by nature anything specially beyond
His other sons, for no one is by nature a son of God, as they say; neither as
having any peculiar property of His own; but God chose Him who was of a mutable
nature, on account of the carefulness of His manners and His practice, which in
no way turned to that which is evil; so that, if Paul and Peter had striven for
this, there would have been no difference between their sonship and His. And
to confirm this insane doctrine, playing with Holy Scripture, they bring forward
what is said in the Psalms respecting Christ: "Thou lovest righteousness, and
hatest wickedness: therefore God, Thy God, bath anointed Thee with the oil of
gladness above Thy fellows,"(2)
4. But that the Son of God was not made "from things which are not," and
that there was no "time when He was not,"(3) the evangelist John sufficiently
shows, when he thus writes concerning Him: "The only-begotten Son, who is in the
bosom of the Father."(4) For since that divine teacher intended to show that
the Father and the Son are two things inseparable the one from the other, he
spoke of Him as being in the bosom of the Father. Now that also the Word of God is
not comprehended in the number of things that were created "from things which
are not," the same John says, "All things were made by Him." For he set forth
His proper personality, saying, "In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was
with God, and the Word was God. All things were made by Him; and with out Him
was not anything made that was made."(5) For if all things were made by Him,
how comes it that He who gave to the things which are made their existence, at
one time Himself was not. For the Word which makes is not to be defined as
being of the same nature with the things which are made; since He indeed was in the
beginning, and all things were made by Him, and fashioned "from things which
are not." Moreover, that which is seems to be contrary to and far removed
froth those things which are made "from things which are not." For that indeed
shows that there is no interval between the Father and the Son, since not even
in thought can the mind imagine any distance between them. But that the world
was created "from things which are not," indicates a more recent a and later
origin of substance, since the universe receives an essence of this sort from the
Father by the Son. When, therefore, the most pious John contemplated the
essence of the divine Word at a very great distance, and as placed beyond all
conception of those things that are begotten, he thought it not meet to speak of His
generation and creation; not daring to designate the Creator in the same terms
as the things that are made. Not that the Word is unbegotten, for the Father
alone is unbegotten, but because the inexplicable subsistence of the
only-begotten Son transcends the acute comprehension of the evangelists, and perhaps also
of angels.
5. Wherefore I do not think that he is to be reckoned amongst the pious
who presumes to inquire into anything beyond these things, not listening to this
saying: "Seek not out the things that are too hard for thee, neither search the
things that are above thy strength."(1) For if the knowledge of many other
things that are incomparably inferior to this, are hidden from human
comprehension, such as in the apostle Paul, "Eye hath not seen, nor ear heard, neither have
entered into the heart of man, the things which God hath prepared for them that
love Him."(2) As also God said to Abraham, that "he could not number the
stars;"(3) and that passage, "Who can number the sand of the sea, and the drops of
rainy"(4) How shall any one be able to investigate too curiously the subsistence
of the divine Word, unless he be smitten with frenzy? Concerning which the
Spirit of prophecy says, "Who shall declare his generation?"(5) And our Saviour
Himself, who blesses the pillars of all things in the world, sought to unburden
them of the knowledge of these things, saying that to comprehend this was quite
beyond their nature, and that to the Father alone belonged the knowledge of
this most divine mystery. "For no man," says He, "knoweth the Son, but the Father:
neither knoweth any man the Father, save the Son."(6) Of this thing also I
think that the Father spoke, in the words, "My secret is to Me and Mine."
6. Now that it is an insane thing to think that the Son was made from
things which are not, and was in being in time, the expression, "from things which
are not," itself shows, although these stupid men understand not the insanity
of their own words. For the expression, "was not," ought either to be reckoned
in time, or in some place of an age. But if it be true that "all things were
made by Him," it is established that both every age and time and all space, and
that "when" in which the "was not" is found, was made by Him. And is it not
absurd that He who fashioned the times and the ages and the seasons, in which that
"was not" is mixed up, to say of Him, that He at some time was not? For it is
devoid of sense, and a mark of great ignorance, to affirm that He who is the
cause of everything is posterior to the origin of that thing. For according to
them, the space of time in which they say that the Son had not yet been made by the
Father, preceded the wisdom of God that fashioned all things, and the
Scripture speaks falsely according to them, which calls Him "the First-born of every
creature." Conformable to which, that which the majestically-speaking Paul says
of Him: "Whom He hath appointed heir of all things. By whom also He made the
worlds. But by Him also were all things created that are in heaven, and that are
in earth, visible and invisible, whether they be thrones or dominions, or
principalities, or powers; all things were created by Him, and for Him; and He is
before all things."(7)
7. Wherefore, since it appears that this hypothesis of a creation from
things which are not is most impious, it is necessary to say that the Father is
always the Father. But He is the Father, since the Son is always with Him, on
account of whom He is called the Father. Wherefore, since the Son is always with
Him, the Father is always perfect, being destitute of nothing as regards good;
who, not in time, nor after an interval, nor from things which are not, hath
begotten His only-begotten Son. How, then, is it not impious to say, that the
wisdom of God once was not which speaks thus concerning itself: "I was with Him
forming all things; I was His delight;"(8) or that the power of God once did not
exist; or that His Word was at any time mutilated; or that other things were
ever wanting from which the Son is known and the Father expressed? For he who
denies that the brightness of the glory existed, takes away also the primitive
light of which it s the brightness. And if the image of God was not always, it
is clear also that He was not always, of which it is the image. Moreover, in
saying that the character of the subsistence of God was not, He also is done away
with who is perfectly expressed by it. Hence one may see that the Sonship of
our Saviour has nothing at all in common with the sonship of the rest. For just
as it has been shown that His inexplicable subsistence excels by an
incomparable excellence all other things to which He has given existence, so also His
Sonship, which is according to the nature of the Godhead of the Father, transcends.
by an ineffable excellence. the sonship of those who have been adopted by Him.
For He, indeed, is of an immutable nature, every way perfect, and wanting in
nothing; but these since they are either way subject to change, stand in need of
help from Him. For what progress can the wisdom of God make? What increase can
the truth itself and God the Word receive? In what respect can the life and
the true light be made better? And if this be so, how much more unnatural is it
that wisdom should ever be capable of folly; that the power of God should be
con-joined with infirmity; that reason should be obscured by unreason; or that
darkness should be mixed up with the true light? And the apostle says, on this
place, "What communion hath light with darkness? and what concord hath Christ with
Belial?"(1) And Solomon says, that it is not possible that it should come to
pass that a man should comprehend with his understanding "the way of a serpent
upon a rock," which is Christ, according to the opinion of Paul. But men and
angels, who are His creatures, have received His blessing that they might make
progress, exercising themselves in virtues and in the commandments of the law, so
as not to sin. Wherefore our Lord, since He is by nature the Son of the Father,
is by all adored. But these, laying aside the spirit of bondage, when by brave
deeds and by progress they have received the spirit of adoption, being blessed
by Him who is the Son by nature, are made sons by adoption.
8. And His proper and peculiar, natural and excellent Sonship, St. Paul
has declared, who thus speaks of God: "Who spared not His own Son, but for us,"
who were not His natural sons, "delivered Him up."(2) For to distinguish Him
from those who are not properly sons, He said that He was His own Son. And in the
Gospel we read: "This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased."(3)
Moreover, in the Psalms the Saviour says: "The Lord hath said unto Me, Thou art my
Son."(4) Where, showing that He is the true and genuine Son, He signifies that
there are no other genuine sons besides Himself. And what, too, is the meaning of
this: "From the womb before the morning I begat thee"?(5) Does He not plainly
indicate the natural sonship of paternal bringing forth, which he obtained not
by the careful framing of His manners, not by the exercise of and increase in
virtue, but by property of nature? Wherefore, the only-begotten Son of the
Father, indeed, possesses an indefectible Sonship; but the adoption of rational sons
belongs not to them by nature, but is prepared for them by the probity of their
life, and by the free gift of God. And it is mutable as the Scripture
recognises: "For when the sons of God saw the daughters of men, they took them
wives,"(6) etc. And in another place: "I have nourished and brought up children, but
they have rebelled against Me,"(7) as we find God speaking by the prophet Isaiah.
9. And though I could say much more, brethren beloved, I purposely omit to
do so, as deeming it to be burdensome at great length to call these things to
the remembrance of teachers who are of the same mind with myself. For ye
yourselves are taught of God, nor are ye ignorant that this doctrine, which hath
lately raised its head against the piety of the Church, is that of Ebion and
Artemas; nor is it aught else but an imitation of Paul of Samosata, bishop of
Antioch, who, by the judgment and counsel of all the bishops, and in every place, was
separated from the Church.(8) To whom Lucian succeeding, remained for many
years separate from the communion of three bishops.(9) And now lately having
drained the dregs of their impiety, there have arisen amongst us those who teach this
doctrine of a creation from things which are not,(10) their hidden sprouts,
Arius and Achilles, and the gathering of those who join in their wickedness. And
three bishops in Syria, having been, in some manner, consecrated on account of
their agreement with them, incite them to worse things. But let the judgment
concerning these be reserved for your trial. For they, retaining in their memory
the words which came to be used with respect to His saving Passion, and
abasement, and examination, and what they call His poverty, and in short of all those
things to which the Saviour submitted for our sakes, bring them forward to
refute His supreme and eternal Godhead. But of those words which signify His
natural glory and nobility, and abiding with the Father, they have become unmindful.
Such as this: "I and My Father are one,"(11) which indeed the Lord says, not as
proclaiming Himself to be the Father, nor to demonstrate that two persons are
one; but that the Son of the Father most exactly preserves the expressed
likeness of the Father, inasmuch as He has by nature impressed upon Him His
similitude in every respect, and is the image of the Father in no way discrepant, and
the expressed figure of the primitive exemplar. Whence, also, to Philip, who
then was desirous to see Him, the Lord shows this abundantly. For when he said,
"Show us the Father,"(12) He answered: "He that hath seen Me, hath seen the
Father," since the Father was Himself seen through the spotless and living mirror
of the divine image. Similar to which is what the saints say in the Psalms: "In
Thy light shall we see light."(13) Wherefore he that honoureth the Son,
honoureth the Father also;"(13) and with reason, for every impious word which they
dare to speak against the Son, has reference to the Father.
10. But after these things, brethren beloved, what is there wonderful in
that which I am about to write, if I shall set forth the false calumnies against
me and our most pious laity? For those who have set themselves in array
against the Godhead of Christ, do not scruple to utter their ungrateful ravings
against as. Who will not either that any of the ancients should be compared with
them, or suffer that any of those whom, from our earliest years, we have used as
instructors should be placed on a level with them. Nay, and they do not think
that any of all those who are now our colleagues, has attained even to a moderate
amount of wisdom; boasting themselves to be the only men who are wise and
divested of worldly possessions, the sole discoverers of dogmas, and that to them
alone are those things revealed which have never before come into the mind of
any other under the sun. Oh, the impious arrogance! Oh, the immeasurable madness!
Oh, the vainglory befitting those that are crazed! Oh, the pride of Satan
which has taken root in their unholy souls. The religious perspicuity of the
ancient Scriptures caused them no shame, nor did the consentient doctrine of our
colleagues concerning Christ keep in check their audacity against Him. Their
impiety not even the demons will bear, who are ever on the watch for a blasphemous
word uttered against the Son.
11. And let these things be now urged according to our power against those
who, with respect to matter which they know nothing of, have, as it were,
rolled in the dust against Christ, and have taken in hand to calumniate our piety
towards Him. For those inventors of stupid fables say, that we who turn away
with aversion from the impious and unscriptural blasphemy against Christ, of those
who speak of His coming from the things which are not assert, that there are
two unbegottens. For they ignorantly affirm that one of two things must
necessarily be said, either that He is from things which are not, or that there are two
unbegottens; nor do those ignorant men know how great is the difference
between the unbegotten Father, and the things which were by Him created from things
which are not, as well the rational as the irrational. Between which two, as
holding the middle place, the only begotten nature of God, the Word by which the
Father formed all things out of nothing, was begotten of the true Father
Himself. As in a certain place the Lord Himself testified, saying, "Every one that
loveth Him that begat, loveth Him also that is begotten of Him.
12. Concerning whom we thus believe, even as the Apostolic Church
believes. In one Father unbegotten, who has from no one the cause of His being, who is
unchangeable and immutable, who is always the same, and admits of no increase
or diminution; who gave to us the Law, the prophets, and the Gospels; who is
Lord of the patriarchs and apostles, and all the saints. And in one Lord Jesus
Christ, the only-begotten Son of God; not begotten of things which are not, but
of Him who is the Father; not in a corporeal manner, by excision or division
as Sabellius and Valentinus thought, but in a certain inexplicable and
unspeakable manner, according to the words of the prophet cited above: "Who shall
declare His generation?"(2) Since that His subsistence no nature which is begotten
can investigate, even as the Father can be investigated by none; because that the
nature of rational beings cannot receive the knowledge of His divine
generation by the Father. But men who are moved by the Spirit of truth, have no need to
learn these things from me, for in our ears are sounding the words before
uttered by Christ on this very thing," No man knoweth the Father, save the Son; and
no man knoweth who the Son is, save the Father."(3) That He is equally with the
Father unchangeable and immutable, wanting in nothing, and the perfect Son,
and like to the Father, we have learnt; in this alone is He inferior to the
Father, that He is not unbegotten. For He is the very exact image of the Father, and
in nothing differing from Him. For it is clear that He is the image fully
containing all things by which the greatest similitude is declared, as the Lord
Himself hath taught us, when He says, "My Father is greater than I."(4) And
according to this we believe that the Son is of the Father, always existing. "For He
is the brightness of His glory, the express image of His Father's person."(5)
But let no one take that word always so as to raise suspicion that He is
unbegotten, as they imagine who have their senses blinded. For neither are the words,
"He was," or "always," or "before all worlds," equivalent to unbegotten. But
neither can the human mind employ any other word to signify unbegotten. And thus
I think that you understand it, and I trust to your right purpose in all
things, since these words do not at all signify unbegotten. For these words seem to
denote simply a lengthening out of time, but the Godhead, and as it were the
antiquity of the only-begotten, they cannot worthily signify; but they have been
employed by holy men, whilst each, according to his capacity, seeks to express
this mystery, asking indulgence from the hearers, and pleading a reasonable
excuse, in saying, Thus far have we attained. But if there be any who are expecting
from mortal lips some word which exceeds human capacity, saying that those
things have been done away which are known in part, it is manifest that the
words," He was," and "always," and "before all ages," come far short of what they
hoped. And whatever word shall be employed is not equivalent to unbegotten.
Therefore to the unbegotten Father, indeed, we ought to preserve His proper dignity,
in confessing that no one is the cause of His being; but to the Son must be
allotted His fitting honour, in assigning to Him, as we have said, a generation
from the Father without beginning, and allotting adoration to Him, so as only
piously and properly to use the words," He was," and "always," and "before all
worlds," with respect to Him; by no means rejecting His Godhead, but ascribing to
Him a similitude which exactly answers in every respect to the Image and
Exemplar of the Father. But we must say that to the Father alone belongs the property
of being unbegotten, for the Saviour Himself said, My Father is greater than
I."(1) And besides the pious opinion concerning the Father and the Son, we
confess to one Holy Spirit, as the divine Scriptures teach us; who hath inaugurated
both the holy men of the Old Testament, and the divine teachers of that which
is called the New. And besides, also, one only Catholic and Apostolic Church,
which can never be destroyed, though all the world should seek to make war with
it; but it is victorious over every most impious revolt of the heretics who rise
up against it. For her Goodman hath confirmed our minds by saying, "Be of good
cheer, I have overcome the world."(2) After this we know of the resurrection
of the dead, the first-fruits of which was our Lord Jesus Christ, who in very
deed, and not in appearance merely, carried a body, of Mary Mother of God, who in
the end of the world came to the human race to put away sin, was crucified and
died, and yet did He not thus perceive any detriment to His divinity, being
raised from the dead, taken up into heaven, seated at the right hand of majesty.
13. These things in part have I written in this epistle, thinking it
burdensome to write out each accurately, even as I said before, because they escape
not your religious diligence. Thus do we teach, thus do we preach. These are
the apostolic doctrines of the Church, for which also we die, esteeming those but
little who would compel us to forswear them, even if they would force us by
tortures, and not casting away our hope in them. To these Arius and Achilles
opposing themselves, and those who with them are the enemies of the truth, have
been expelled from the Church, as being aliens from our holy doctrine, according
to the blessed Paul, who says, "If any man preach any other gospel unto you than
that ye have received, let him be accursed; even though he feign himself an
angel from heaven."(3) And also, "If any man teach otherwise, and consent not to
the wholesome words of our Lord Jesus Christ, and to the doctrine which is
according to godliness; he is proud, knowing nothing,"(4) and so forth. These,
therefore, who have been anathematized by the brotherhood, let no one of you
receive, nor admit of those things which are either said or written by them. For
these seducers do always lie, nor will they ever speak the truth. They go about the
cities, attempting nothing else but that under the mark of friendship and the
name of peace, by their hypocrisy and blandishments, they may give and receive
letters, to deceive by means of these a few "silly women, and laden with sins,
who have been led captive by them,"(5) and so forth.
14. These men, therefore, who have dared such things against Christ; who
have partly in public derided the Christian religion; partly seek to traduce and
inform against its professors before the judgment-seats; who in a time of
peace, as far as in them lies, have stirred up a persecution against us; who have
enervated the ineffable mystery of Christ's generation; from these, I say,
beloved and like-minded brethren, turning away in aversion, give your suffrages with
us against their mad daring; even as our colleagues have done, who being moved
with indignation, have both written to us letters against these men, and have
subscribed our letter. Which also I have sent unto you by my son Apion the
deacon, being some of them from the whole of Egypt and the Thebaid, some from Libya
and Pentapolis. There are others also from Syria, Lycia, Pamphylia, Asia,
Cappadocia, and the other neighbouring provinces. After the example of which I
trust also that I shall receive letters from you. For though I have prepared many
helps towards curing those who have suffered injury, this is the especial remedy
that has been devised for healing the multitudes that have been deceived by
them, that they may comply with the general consent of our colleagues, and thus
hasten to return to repentance. Salute one another, together with the brethren
who are with you. I pray that ye may be strong in the Lord, beloved, and that I
may profit by your love towards Christ.