THE CITY OF GOD: BOOK IV
BOOK IV.(1)
ARGUMENT.
IN THIS BOOK IT IS PROVED THAT THE EXTENT AND LONG DURATION OF THE ROMAN
EMPIRE IS TO BE ASCRIBED, NOT TO JOVE OR THE GODS OF THE HEATHEN, TO WHOM
INDIVIDUALLY SCARCE EVEN SINGLE THINGS AND THE VERY BASEST FUNCTIONS WERE BELIEVED TO BE
ENTRUSTED, BUT TO THE ONE TRUE GOD, THE AUTHOR OF FELICITY, BY WHOSE POWER AND
JUDGMENT EARTHLY KINGDOMS ARE FOUNDED AND MAINTAINED.
CHAPTER 1.--OF THE THINGS WHICH HAVE BEEN DISCUSSED IN THE FIRST BOOK.
HAVING begun to speak of the city of God, I have thought it necessary
first of all to reply to its enemies, who, eagerly pursuing earthly joys and gaping
after transitory things, throw the blame of all the sorrow they suffer in
them--rather through the compassion of God in admonishing than His severity in
punishing--on the Christian religion, which is the one salutary and true religion.
And since there is among them also an unlearned rabble, they are stirred up as
by the authority of the learned to hate us more bitterly, thinking in their
inexperience that things which have happened unwontedly in their days were not
wont to happen in other times gone by; and whereas this opinion of theirs is
confirmed even by those who know that it is false, and yet dissemble their knowledge
in order that they may seem to have just cause for murmuring against us, it
was necessary, from books in which their authors recorded and published the
history of bygone times that it might be known, to demonstrate that it is far
otherwise than they think; and at the same time to teach that the false gods, whom
they openly worshipped, or still worship in secret, are most unclean spirits, and
most malignant and deceitful demons, even to such a pitch that they take
delight in crimes which, whether real or only fictitious, are yet their own, which
it has been their will to have celebrated in honor of them at their own
festivals; so that human infirmity cannot be called back from the perpetration of
damnable deeds, so long as authority is furnished for imitating them that seems even
divine. These things we have proved, not from our own conjectures, but partly
from recent memory, because we ourselves have seen such things celebrated, and
to such deities, partly from the writings of those who have left these things
on record to posterity, not as if in reproach but as in honor of their own gods.
Thus Varro, a most learned man among them, and of the weightiest authority,
when he made separate books concerning things human and things divine,
distributing some among the human, others among the divine, according to the special
dignity of each, placed the scenic plays not at all among things human, but among
things divine; though, certainly, if only there were good and honest men in the
state, the scenic plays ought not to be allowed even among things human. And
this he did not on his own authority, but because, being born and educated at
Rome, he found them among the divine things. Now as we briefly stated in the end
of the first book what we intended afterwards to discuss, and as we have
disposed of a part of this in the next two books, we see what our readers will expect
us now to take up.
CHAP. 2.--OF THOSE THINGS WHICH ARE CONTAINED IN BOOKS SECOND AND THIRD.
We had promised, then, that we would say something against those who
attribute the calamities of the Roman republic to our religion, and that we would
recount the evils, as many and great as we could remember or might deem
sufficient, which that city, or the provinces belonging to its empire, had suffered
before their sacrifices were prohibited, all of which would beyond doubt have been
attributed to us, if our religion had either already shone on them, or had thus
prohibited their sacrilegious rites. These things we have, as we think, fully
disposed of in the second and third books, treating in the second of evils in
morals, which alone or chiefly are to be accounted evils; and in the third, of
those which only fools dread to undergo--namely, those of the body or of outward
things--which for the most part the good also suffer. But those evils by which
they themselves become evil, they take, I do not say patiently, but with
pleasure. And how few evils have I related concerning that one city and its empire!
Not even all down to the time of Caesar Augustus. What if I had chosen to
recount and enlarge on those evils, not which men have inflicted on each other; such
as the devastations and destructions of war, but which happen in earthly
things, from the elements of the world itself. Of such evils Apuleius speaks briefly
in one passage of that book which he wrote, De Mundo, saying that all earthly
things are subject to change, overthrow, and destruction.(1) For, to use his
own words, by excessive earthquakes the ground has burst asunder, and cities with
their inhabitants have been clean destroyed: by sudden rains whole regions
have been washed away; those also which formerly had been continents, have been
insulated by strange and new-come waves, and others, by the subsiding of the sea,
have been made passable by the foot of man: by winds and storms cities have
been overthrown; fires have flashed forth from the clouds, by which regions in
the East being burnt up have perished; and on the western coasts the like
destructions have been caused by the bursting forth of waters and floods. So,
formerly, from the lofty craters of Etna, rivers of fire kindled by God have flowed
like a torrent down the steeps. If I had wished to collect from history wherever I
could, these and similar instances, where should I have finished what happened
even in those times before the name of Christ had put down those of their
idols, so vain and hurtful to true salvation? I promised that I should also point
out which of their customs, and for what cause, the true God, in whose power all
kingdoms are, had deigned to favor to the enlargement of their empire; and how
those whom they think gods can have profited them nothing, but much rather
hurt them by deceiving and beguiling them; so that it seems to me I must now speak
of these things, and chiefly of the increase of the Roman empire. For I have
already said not a little, especially in the second book, about the many evils
introduced into their manners by the hurtful deceits of the demons whom they
worshipped as gods. But throughout all the three books already completed, where it
appeared suitable, we have set forth how much succor God, through the name of
Christ, to whom the barbarians beyond the custom of war paid so much honor, has
bestowed on the good and bad, according as it is written, "Who maketh His sun
to rise on the good and the evil, and giveth rain to the just and the
unjust."(2)
CHAP. 3.--WHETHER THE GREAT EXTENT OF THE EMPIRE, WHICH HAS BEEN ACQUIRED ONLY
BY WARS, IS TO BE RECKONED AMONG THE GOOD THINGS EITHER OF THE WISE OR THE
HAPPY.
Now, therefore, let us see how it is that they dare to ascribe the very
great extent and duration of the Roman empire to those gods whom they contend
that they worship honorably, even by the obsequies of vile games and the ministry
of vile men: although I should like first to inquire for a little what reason,
what prudence, there is in wishing to glory in the greatness and extent of the
empire, when you cannot point out the happiness of men who are always rolling,
with dark fear and cruel lust, in warlike slaughters and in blood, which,
whether shed in civil or foreign war, is still human blood; so that their joy may be
compared to glass in its fragile splendor, of which one is horribly afraid
lest it should be suddenly broken in pieces. That this may be more easily
discerned, let us not come to nought by being carried away with empty boasting, or
blunt the edge of our attention by loud-sounding names of things, when we hear of
peoples, kingdoms, provinces. But let us suppose a case of two men; for each
individual man, like one letter in a language, is as it were the element of a city
or kingdom, however far-spreading in its occupation of the earth. Of these two
men let us suppose that one is poor, or rather of middling circumstances; the
other very rich. But the rich man is anxious with fears, pining with
discontent, burning with covetousness, never secure, always uneasy, panting from the
perpetual strife of his enemies, adding to his patrimony indeed by these miseries
to an immense degree, and by these additions also heaping up most bitter cares.
But that other man of moderate wealth is contented with a small and compact
estate, most dear to his own family, enjoying the sweetest peace with his kindred
neighbors and friends, in piety religious, benignant in mind, healthy in body,
in life frugal, in manners chaste, in conscience secure. I know not whether any
one can be such a fool, that he dare hesitate which to prefer. As, therefore,
in the case of these two men, so in two families, in two nations, in two
kingdoms, this test of tranquility holds good; and if we apply it vigilantly and
without prejudice, we shall quite easily see where the mere show of happiness
dwells, and where real felicity. Wherefore if the true God is worshipped, and if He
is served with genuine rites and true virtue, it is advantageous that good men
should long reign both far and wide. Nor is this advantageous so much to
themselves, as to those over whom they reign. For, so far as concerns themselves,
their piety and probity, which are great gifts of God, suffice to give them true
felicity, enabling them to live well the life that now is, and afterwards to
receive that which is eternal. In this world, therefore, the dominion of good men
is profitable, not so much for themselves as for human affairs. But the
dominion of bad men is hurtful chiefly to themselves who rule, for they destroy their
own souls by greater license in wickedness; while those who are put under them
in service are not hurt except by their own iniquity. For to the just all the
evils imposed on them by unjust rulers are not the punishment of crime, but the
test of virtue. Therefore the good man, although he is a slave, is free; but
the bad man, even if he reigns, is a slave, and that not of one man, but, what is
far more grievous, of as many masters as he has vices; of which vices when the
divine Scripture treats, it says, "For of whom any man is overcome, to the
same he is also the bond-slave."(1)
CHAP. 4.--HOW LIKE KINGDOMS WITHOUT JUSTICE ARE TO ROBBERIES.
Justice being taken away, then, what are kingdoms but great robberies? For
what are robberies themselves, but little kingdoms? The band itself is made up
of men; it is ruled by the authority of a prince, it is knit together by the
pact of the confederacy; the booty is divided by the law agreed on. If, by the
admittance of abandoned men, this evil increases to such a degree that it holds
places, fixes abodes, takes possession of cities, and subdues peoples, it
assumes the more plainly the name of a kingdom, because the reality is now
manifestly conferred on it, not by the removal of covetousness, but by the addition of
impunity. Indeed, that was an apt and true reply which was given to Alexander
the Great by a pirate who had been seized. For when that king had asked the man
what he meant by keeping hostile possession of the sea, he answered with bold
pride, "What thou meanest by seizing the whole earth; but because I do it with a
petty ship, I am called a robber, whilst thou who dost it with a great fleet
art styled emperor."(2)
CHAP. 5.--OF THE RUNAWAY GLADIATORS WHOSE POWER BECAME LIKE THAT OF ROYAL
DIGNITY.
I shall not therefore stay to inquire what sort of men Romulus gathered
together, seeing he deliberated much about them,--how, being assumed out of that
life they led into the fellowship of his city, they might cease to think of the
punishment they deserved, the fear of which had driven them to greater
villainies; so that henceforth they might be made more peaceable members of society.
But this I say, that the Roman empire, which by subduing many nations had
already grown great and an object of universal dread, was itself greatly alarmed, and
only with much difficulty avoided a disastrous overthrow, because a mere
handful of gladiators in Campania, escaping from the games, had recruited a great
army, appointed three generals, and most widely and cruelly devastated Italy. Let
them say what god aided these men, so that from a small and contemptible band
of robbers they attained to a kingdom, feared even by the Romans, who had such
great forces and fortresses. Or will they deny that they were divinely aided
because they did not last long?(3) As if, indeed, the life of any man whatever
lasted long. In that case, too, the gods aid no one to reign, since all
individuals quickly die; nor is sovereign power to be reckoned a benefit, because in a
little time in every man, and thus in all of them one by one, it vanishes like a
vapor. For what does it matter to those who worshipped the gods under Romulus,
and are long since dead, that after their death the Roman empire has grown so
great, while they plead their causes before the powers beneath? Whether those
causes are good or bad, it matters not to the question before us. And this is to
be understood of all those who carry with them the heavy burden of their
actions, having in the few days of their life swiftly and hurriedly passed over the
stage of the imperial office, although the office itself has lasted through
long spaces of time, being filled by a constant succession of dying men. If,
however, even those benefits which last only for the shortest time are to be
ascribed to the aid of the gods, these gladiators were not a little aided, who broke
the bonds of their servile condition, fled, escaped, raised a great and most
powerful army, obedient to the will and orders of their chiefs and much feared by
the Roman majesty, and remaining unsubdued by several Roman generals, seized
many places, and, having won very many victories, enjoyed whatever pleasures they
wished, and did what their lust suggested, and, until at last they were
conquered, which was done with the utmost difficulty, lived sublime and dominant. But
let us come to greater matters.
CHAP. 6.--CONCERNING THE COVETOUSNESS OF NINUS, WHO WAS THE FIRST WHO MADE WAR
ON HIS NEIGHBORS, THAT HE MIGHT RULE MORE WIDELY.
Justinus, who wrote Greek or rather foreign history in Latin, and briefly,
like Trogus Pompeius whom he followed, begins his work thus: "In the beginning
of the affairs of peoples and nations the government was in the hands of
kings, who were raised to the height of this majesty not by courting the people, but
by the knowledge good men had of their moderation. The people were held bound
by no laws; the decisions of the princes were instead of laws. It was the
custom to guard rather than to extend the boundaries of the empire; and kingdoms
were kept within the bounds of each ruler's native land. Ninus king of the
Assyrians first of all, through new lust of empire, changed the old and, as it were,
ancestral custom of nations. He first made war on his neighbors, and wholly
subdued as far as to the frontiers of Libya the nations as yet untrained to
resist." And a little after he says: "Ninus established by constant possession the
greatness of the authority he had gained. Having mastered his nearest neighbors,
he went on to others, strengthened by the accession of forces, and by making
each fresh victory the instrument of that which followed, subdued the nations of
the whole East." Now, with whatever fidelity to fact either he or Trogus may in
general have written--for that they sometimes told lies is shown by other more
trustworthy writers--yet it is agreed among other authors, that the kingdom of
the Assyrians was extended far and wide by King Ninus. And it lasted so long,
that the Roman empire has not yet attained the same age; for, as those write who
have treated of chronological history, this kingdom endured for twelve hundred
and forty years from the first year in which Ninus began to reign, until it
was transferred to the Modes. But to make war on your neighbors, and thence to
proceed to others, and through mere lust of dominion to crush and subdue people
who do you no harm, what else is this to be called than great robbery?
CHAP. 7.--WHETHER EARTHLY KINGDOMS IN THEIR RISE AND FALL HAVE BEEN EITHER
AIDED OR DESERTED BY THE HELP OF THE GODS.
If this kingdom was so great and lasting without the aid of the gods, why
is the ample territory and long duration of the Roman empire to be ascribed to
the Roman gods? For whatever is the cause in it, the same is in the other also.
But if they contend that the prosperity of the other also is to be attributed
to the aid of the gods, I ask of which? For the other nations whom Ninus
overcame, did not then worship other gods. Or if the Assyrians had gods of their own,
who, so to speak, were more skillful workmen in the construction and
preservation of the empire, whether are they dead, since they themselves have also lost
the empire; or, having been defrauded of their pay, or promised a greater, have
they chosen rather to go over to the Medes, and from them again to the
Persians, because Cyrus invited them, and promised them something still more
advantageous? This nation, indeed, since the time of the kingdom of Alexander the
Macedonian, which was as brief in duration as it was great in extent, has preserved
its own empire, and at this day occupies no small territories in the East. If
this is so, then either the gods are unfaithful, who desert their own and go over
to their enemies, which Camillus, who was but a man, did not do, when, being
victor and subduer of a most hostile state, although he had felt that Rome, for
whom he had done so much, was ungrateful, yet afterwards, forgetting the injury
and remembering his native land, he freed her again from the Gauls; or they
are not so strong as gods ought to be, since they can be overcome by human skill
or strength. Or if, when they carry on war among themselves. the gods are not
overcome by men, but some gods who are peculiar to certain cities are perchance
overcome by other gods, it follows that they have quarrels among themselves
which they uphold, each for his own part. Therefore a city ought not to worship
its own gods, but rather others who aid their own worshippers. Finally, whatever
may have been the case as to this change of sides, or flight, or migration, or
failure in battle on the part of the gods, the name of Christ had not yet been
proclaimed in those parts of the earth when these kingdoms were lost and
transferred through great destructions in war. For if, after more than twelve hundred
years, when the kingdom was taken away from the Assyrians, the Christian
religion had there already preached another eternal kingdom, and put a stop to the
sacrilegious worship of false gods, what else would the foolish men of that
nation have said, but that the kingdom which had been so long preserved, could be
lost for no other cause than the desertion of their own religions and the
reception of Christianity? In which foolish speech that might have been uttered, let
those we speak of observe their own likeness, and blush, if there is any sense
of shame in them, because they have uttered similar complaints; although the
Roman empire is afflicted rather than changed,--a thing which has befallen it in
other times also, before the name of Christ was heard, and it has been restored
after such affliction,--a thing which even in these times is not to be
despaired of. For who knows the will of God concerning this matter?
CHAP. 8.--WHICH OF THE GODS CAN THE ROMANS SUPPOSE PRESIDED OVER THE INCREASE
AND PRESERVATION OF THEIR EMPIRE, WHEN THEY HAVE BELIEVED THAT EVEN THE CARE OF
SINGLE THINGS COULD SCARCELY BE COMMITTED TO SINGLE GODS?
Next let us ask, if they please, out of so great a crowd of gods which the
Romans worship, whom in especial, or what gods they believe to have extended
and preserved that empire. Now, surely of this work, which is so excellent and
so very full of the highest dignity, they dare not ascribe any part to the
goddess Cloacina;(1) or to Volupia, who has her appellation from voluptuousness; or
to Libentina, who has her name from lust; or to Vaticanus, who presides over
the screaming of infants; or to Cunina, who rules over their cradles. But how is
it possible to recount in one part of this book all the names of gods or
goddesses, which they could scarcely comprise in great volumes, distributing among
these divinities their peculiar offices about single things? They have not even
thought that the charge of their lands should be committed to any one god: but
they have entrusted their farms to Rusina; the ridges of the mountains to
Jugatinus; over the downs they have set the goddess Collatina; over the valleys,
Vallonia. Nor could they even find one Segetia so competent, that they could
commend to her care all their corn crops at once; but so long as their seed-corn was
still under the ground, they would have the goddess Seia set over it; then,
whenever it was above ground and formed straw, they set over it the goddess
Segetia; and when the grain was collected and stored, they set over it the goddess
Tutilina, that it might be kept safe. Who would not have thought that goddess
Segetia sufficient to take care of the standing corn until it had passed from the
first green blades to the dry ears? Yet she was not enough for men, who loved a
multitude of gods, that the miserable soul, despising the chaste embrace of
the one true God, should be prostituted to a crowd of demons. Therefore they set
Proserpina over the germinating seeds; over the joints and knots of the stems,
the god Nodotus; over the sheaths enfolding the ears, the goddess Voluntina;
when the sheaths opened that the spike might shoot forth, it was ascribed to the
goddess Patelana; when the stems stood all equal with new ears, because the
ancients described this equalizing by the term hostire, it was ascribed to the
goddess Hostilina; when the grain was in flower, it was dedicated to the goddess
Flora; when full of milk, to the god Lacturnus; when maturing, to the goddess
Matuta; when the crop was runcated,--that is, removed from the soil,--to the
goddess Runcina. Nor do I yet recount them all, for I am sick of all this, though
it gives them no shame. Only, I have said these very few things, in order that
it may be understood they dare by no means say that the Roman empire has been
established, increased, and preserved by their deities, who had all their own
functions assigned to them in such a way, that no general oversight was entrusted
to any one of them. When, therefore, could Segetia take care of the empire, who
was not allowed to take care of the corn and the trees? When could Cunina take
thought about war, whose oversight was not allowed to go beyond the cradles of
the babies? When could Nodotus give help in battle, who had nothing to do even
with the sheath of the ear, but only with the knots of the joints? Every one
sets a porter at the door of his house, and because he is a man, he is quite
sufficient; but these people have set three gods, Forculus to the doors, Cardea to
the hinge, Limentinus to the threshold.(1) Thus Forculus could not at the same
time take care also of the hinge and the threshold.
CHAP. 9.--WHETHER THE GREAT EXTENT AND LONG DURATION OF THE ROMAN EMPIRE
SHOULD BE ASCRIBED TO JOVE, WHOM HIS WORSHIPPERS BELIEVE TO BE THE CHIEF GOD.
Therefore omitting, or passing by for a little, that crowd of petty gods,
we ought to inquire into the part performed by the great gods, whereby Rome has
been made sO great as to reign so long over so many nations. Doubtless,
therefore, this is the work of love. For they will have it that he is the king of all
the gods and goddesses, as is shown by his sceptre and by the Capitol on the
lofty hill. Concerning that god they publish a saying which, although that of a
poet, is most apt, "All things are full of Jove."(2) Varro believes that this
god is worshipped, although called by another name, even by those who worship
one God alone without any image. But if this is so, why has he been so badly used
at Rome (and indeed by other nations too), that an image of him should be
made?--a thing which was so displeasing to Varro himself, that although he was
overborne by the perverse custom of so great a city, he had not the least
hesitation in both saying and writing, that those who have appointed images for the
people have both taken away fear and added error.
CHAP. 10.--WHAT OPINIONS THOSE HAVE FOLLOWED WHO HAVE SET DIVERS GODS OVER
DIVERS PARTS OF THE WORLD.
Why, also, is Juno united to him as his wife, who is called at once
"sister and yoke-fellow?"(3) Because, say they, we have Jove in the ether, Juno in
the air; and these two elements are united, the one being superior, the other
inferior. It is not he, then, of whom it is said, "All things are full of Jove,"
if Juno also fills some part. Does each fill either, and are both of this couple
in both of these elements, and in each of them at the same time? Why, then, is
the ether given to Jove, the air to Juno? Besides, these two should have been
enough. Why is it that the sea is assigned to Neptune, the earth to Pluto? And
that these also might not be left without mates, Salacia is joined to Neptune,
Proserpine to Pluto. For they say that, as Juno possesses the lower part of the
heavens,--that is, the air,--so Salacia possesses the lower part of the sea,
and Proserpine the lower part of the earth. They seek how they may patch up
these fables, but they find no way. For if these things were so, their ancient
sages would have maintained that there are three chief elements of the world, not
four, in order that each of the elements might have a pair of gods. Now, they
have positively affirmed that the ether is one thing, the air another. But water,
whether higher or lower, is surely water. Suppose it ever so unlike, can it
ever be so much so as no longer to be water? And the lower earth, by whatever
divinity it may be distinguished, what else can it be than earth? Lo, then, since
the whole physical world is complete in these four or three elements, where
shall Minerva be? What should she possess, what should she fill? For she is placed
in the Capitol along with these two, although she is not the offspring of
their marriage. Or if they say that she possesses the higher part of the
ether,--and on that account the poets have feigned that she sprang from the head of
Jove,--why then is she not rather reckoned queen of the gods, because she is
superior to Jove? Is it because it would be improper to set the daughter before the
father? Why, then, is not that rule of justice observed concerning Jove himself
toward Saturn? Is it because he was conquered? Have they fought then? By no
means, say they; that is an old wife's fable. Lo, we are not to believe fables, and
must hold more worthy opinions concerning the gods ! Why, then, do they not
assign to the father of Jove a seat, if not of higher, at least of equal honor?
Because Saturn, say they, is length of time.(4) Therefore they who worship
Saturn worship Time; and it is insinuated that Jupiter, the king of the gods, was
born of Time. For is anything unworthy said when Jupiter and Juno are said to
have been sprung from Time, if he is the heaven and she is the earth, since both
heaven and earth have been made, and are therefore not eternal? For their
learned and wise men have this also in their books. Nor is that saying taken by
Virgil out of poetic figments, but out of the books of philosophers,
"Then Ether, the Father Almighty, in copious showers descended
Into his spouse's glad bosom, making it fertile,"(5)
--that is, into the bosom of Tellus, or the earth. Although here, also, they
will have it that there are some differences, and think that in the earth
herself Terra is one thing, Tellus another, and Tellumo another. And they have all
these as gods, called by their own names distinguished by their own offices, and
venerated with their own altars and rites. This same earth also they call the
mother of the gods, so that even the fictions of the poets are more tolerable,
if, according, not to their poetical but sacred books, Juno is not only the
sister and wife, but also the mother of Jove. The same earth they worship as Ceres,
and also as Vests; while yet they more frequently affirm that Vests is nothing
else than fire, pertaining to the hearths, without which the city cannot
exist; and therefore virgins are wont to serve her, because as nothing is born of a
virgin, so nothing is born of fire;--but all this nonsense ought to be
completely abolished and extinguished by Him who is born of a virgin. For who can bear
that, while they ascribe to the fire so much honor, and, as it were, chastity,
they do not blush sometimes even to call Vests Venus, so that honored virginity
may vanish in her hand-maidens? For if Vests is Venus, how can virgins rightly
serve her by abstaining from venery? Are there two Venuses, the one a virgin,
the other not a maid? Or rather, are there three, one the goddess of virgins,
who is also called Vesta, another the goddess of wives, and another of harlots?
To her also the Phenicians offered a gift by prostituting their daughters
before they united them to husbands.(1) Which of these is the wife of Vulcan?
Certainly not the virgin, since she has a husband. Far be it from us to say it is
the harlot, lest we should seem to wrong the son of Juno and fellow-worker of
Minerva. Therefore it is to be understood that she belongs to the married people;
but we would not wish them to imitate her in what she did with Mars. "Again,"
say they, "you return to fables." What sort of justice is that, to be angry with
us because we say such things of their gods, and not to be angry with
themselves, who in their theatres most willingly behold the crimes of their gods?
And,--a thing incredible, if it were not thoroughly well proved,--these very
theatric representations of the crimes of their gods have been instituted in honor of
these same gods.
CHAP. 11.--CONCERNING THE MANY GODS WHOM THE PAGAN DOCTORS DEFEND AS BEING ONE
AND THE SAME JOVE.
Let them therefore assert as many things as ever they please in physical
reasonings and disputations. One while let Jupiter be the soul of this corporeal
world, who fills and moves that whole mass, constructed and compacted out of
four, or as many elements as they please; another while, let him yield to his
sister and brothers their parts of it: now let him be the ether, that from above
he may embrace Juno, the air spread out beneath; again, let him be the whole
heaven along with the air, and impregnate with fertilizing showers and seeds the
earth, as his wife, and, at the same time, his mother (for this is not vile in
divine beings); and yet again (that it may not be necessary to run through them
all), let him, the one god, of whom many think it has been said by a most
noble poet,
"For God pervadeth all things,
All lands, and the tracts of the sea, and the depth of the heavens,"(2)--
let it be him who in the ether is Jupiter; in the air, Juno; in the sea,
Neptune; in the lower parts of the sea, Salacia; in the earth, Pluto; in the lower
part of the earth, Proserpine; on the domestic hearths, Vesta; in the furnace of
the workmen, Vulcan; among the stars, Sol and Luna, and the Stars; in
divination, Apollo; in merchandise, Mercury; in Janus, the initiator; in Terminus, the
terminator; Saturn, in time; Mars and Bellona, in war; Liber, in vineyards;
Ceres, in cornfields; Diana, in forests; Minerva, in learning. Finally, let it be
him who is in that crowd, as it were, of plebeian gods: let him preside under
the name of Liber over the seed of men, and under that of Libera over that of
women: let him be Diespiter, who brings forth the birth to the light of day: let
him be the goddess Mena, whom they set over the menstruation of women: let him
be Lucina, who is invoked by women in childbirth: let him bring help to those
who are being born, by taking them up from the bosom of the earth, and let him
be called Opis: let him open the mouth in the crying babe, and be called the god
Vaticanus: let him lift it from the earth, and be called the goddess Levana;
let him watch over cradles, and be called the goddess Cunina: let it be no other
than he who is in those goddesses, who sing the fates of the new born, and are
called Carmentes: let him preside over fortuitous events, and be called
Fortuna: in the goddess Rumina, let him milk out the breast to the little one,
because the ancients termed the breast ruma: in the goddess Potina, let him
administer drink: in the goddess Educa, let him supply food: from the terror of infants,
let him be styled Paventia: from the hope which comes, Venilia: from
voluptuousness, Volupia: from action, Agenor: from the stimulants by which man is
spurred on to much action, let him be named the goddess Stimula: let him be the
goddess Strenia, for making strenuous; Numeria, who teaches to number; Camoena, who
teaches to sing: let him be both the god Consus for granting counsel, and the
goddess Sentia for inspiring sentences: let him be the goddess Juventas, who,
after the robe of boyhood is laid aside, takes charge of the beginning of the
youthful age: let him be Fortuna Barbata, who endues adults with a beard, whom
they have not chosen to honor; so that this divinity, whatever it may be, should
at least be a male god, named either Barbatus, from barba, like Nodotus, from
nodus; or, certainly, not Fortuna, but because he has beards, Fortunius: let him,
in the god Jugatinus, yoke couples in marriage; and when the girdle of the
virgin wife is loosed, let him be invoked as the goddess Virginiensis: let him be
Mutunus or Tuternus, who, among the Greeks, is called Priapus. If they are not
ashamed of it, let all these which I have named, and whatever others I have not
named (for I have not thought fit to name all), let all these gods and
goddesses be that one Jupiter, whether, as some will have it, all these are parts of
him, or are his powers, as those think who are pleased to consider him the soul
of the world, which is the opinion of most of their doctors, and these the
greatest. If these things are so (how evil they may be I do not yet meanwhile
inquire), what would they lose, if they, by a more prudent abridgment, should
worship one god? For what part of him could be contemned if he himself should be
worshipped? But if they are afraid lest parts of him should be angry at being
passed by or neglected, then it is not the case, as they will have it, that this
whole is as the life of one living being, which contains all the gods together, as
if they were its virtues, or members, or parts; but each part has its own life
separate from the rest, if it is so that one can be angered, appeased, or
stirred up more than another. But if it is said that all together,--that is, the
whole Jove himself,--would be offended if his parts were not also worshipped
singly and minutely, it is foolishly spoken. Surely none of them could be passed by
if he who singly possesses them all should be worshipped. For, to omit other
things which are innumerable, when they say that all the stars are parts of
Jove, and are all alive, and have rational souls, and therefore without controversy
are gods, can they not see how many they do not worship, to how many they do
not build temples or set up altars, and to how very few, in fact, of the stars
they have thought of setting them up and offering sacrifice? If, therefore,
those are displeased who are not severally worshipped, do they not fear to live
with only a few appeased, while all heaven is displeased? But if they worship all
the stars because they are part of Jove whom they worship, by the same
compendious method they could supplicate them all in him alone. For in this way no one
would be displeased, since in him alone all would be supplicated. No one would
be contemned, instead of there being just cause of displeasure given to the
much greater number who are passed by in the worship offered to some; especially
when Priapus, stretched out in vile nakedness, is preferred to those who shine
from their supernal abode.
CHAP. 12.--CONCERNING THE OPINION OF THOSE WHO HAVE THOUGHT THAT GOD IS THE
SOUL OF THE WORLD, AND THE WORLD IS THE BODY OF GOD.
Ought not men of intelligence, and indeed men of every kind, to be stirred
up to examine the nature of this opinion? For there is no need of excellent
capacity for this task, that putting away the desire of contention, they may
observe that if God is the soul of the world, and the world is as a body to Him,
who is the soul, He must be one living being consisting of soul and body, and
that this same God is a kind of womb of nature containing all things in Himself,
so that the lives and souls of all living things are taken, according to the
manner of each one's birth, out of His soul which vivifies that whole mass, and
therefore nothing at all remains which is not a part of God. And if this is so,
who cannot see what impious and irreligious consequences follow, such as that
whatever one may trample, he must trample a part of God, and in slaying any
living creature, a part of God must be slaughtered? But I am unwilling to utter all
that may occur to those who think of it, Vet cannot be spoken without
irreverence.
CHAP. 13.--CONCERNING THOSE WHO ASSERT THAT ONLY RATIONAL ANIMALS ARE PARTS OF
THE ONE GOD.
But if they contend that only rational animals, such as men, are parts of
God, I do not really see how, if the whole world is God, they can separate
beasts from being parts of Him. But what need is there of striving about that?
Concerning the rational animal himself,--that is, man,--what more unhappy belief
can be entertained than that a part of God is whipped when a boy is whipped? And
who, unless he is quite mad, could bear the thought that parts of God can
become lascivious, iniquitous, impious, and altogether damnable? In brief, why is
God angry at those who do not worship Him, since these offenders are parts of
Himself? It remains, therefore, that they must say that all the gods have their
own lives; that each one lives for himself, and none of them is a part of any
one; but that all are to be worshipped,--at least as many as can be known and
worshipped; for they are so many it is impossible that all can be so. And of all
these, I believe that Jupiter, because he presides as king, is thought by them to
have both established and extended the Roman empire. For if he has not done
it, what other god do they believe could have attempted so great a work, when
they must all be occupied with their own offices and works, nor can one intrude on
that of another? Could the kingdom of men then be propagated and increased by
the king of the gods?
CHAP. 14.--THE ENLARGEMENT OF KINGDOMS IS UNSUITABLY ASCRIBED TO JOVE; FOR IF,
AS THEY WILL HAVE IT, VICTORIA IS A GODDESS, SHE ALONE WOULD SUFFICE FOR THIS
BUSINESS.
Here, first of all, I ask, why even the kingdom itself is not some god.
For why should not it also be so, if Victory is a goddess? Or what need is there
of Jove himself in this affair, if Victory favors and is propitious, and always
goes to those whom she wishes to be victorious? With this goddess favorable
and propitious, even if Jove was idle and did nothing, what nations could remain
unsubdued, what kingdom would not yield? But perhaps it is displeasing to good
men to fight with most wicked unrighteousness, and provoke with voluntary war
neighbors who are peaceable and do no wrong, in order to enlarge a kingdom? If
they feel thus, I entirely approve and praise them.
CHAP. 15.--WHETHER IT IS SUITABLE FOR GOOD MEN TO WISH TO RULE MORE WIDELY.
Let them ask, then, whether it is quite fitting for good men to rejoice in
extended empire. For the iniquity of those with whom just wars are carried on
favors the growth of a kingdom, which would certainly have been small if the
peace and justice of neighbors had not by any wrong provoked the carrying on of
war against them; and human affairs being thus more happy, all kingdoms would
have been small, rejoicing in neighborly concord; and thus there would have been
very many kingdoms of nations in the world, as there are very many houses of
citizens in a city. Therefore, to carry on war and extend a kingdom over wholly
subdued nations seems to bad men to be felicity, to good men necessity. But
because it would be worse that the injurious should rule over those who are more
righteous, therefore even that is not unsuitably called felicity. But beyond
doubt it is greater felicity to have a good neighbor at peace, than to conquer a
bad one by making war. Your wishes are bad, when you desire that one whom you
hate or fear should be in such a condition that you can conquer him. If,
therefore, by carrying on wars that were just, not impious or unrighteous, the Romans
could have acquired so great an empire, ought they not to worship as a goddess
even the injustice of foreigners? For we see that this has cooperated much in
extending the empire, by making foreigners so unjust that they became people with
whom just wars might be carried on, and the empire increased And why may not
injustice, at least that of foreign nations, also be a goddess, if Fear and Dread
and Ague have deserved to be Roman gods? By these two, therefore,--that is, by
foreign injustice, and the goddess Victoria, for injustice stirs up causes of
wars, and Victoria brings these same wars to a happy termination,--the empire
has increased, even although Jove has been idle. For what part could Jove have
here, when those things which might be thought to be his benefits are held to be
gods, called gods, worshipped as gods, and are themselves invoked for their
own parts? He also might have some part here, if he himself might be called
Empire, just as she is called Victory. Or if empire is the gift of ove, why may not
victory also be held to be his gift? And it certainly would have been held to
be so, had he been recognized and worshipped, not as a stone in the Capitol, but
as the true King of kings and Lord of lords.
CHAP. 16.--WHAT WAS THE REASON WHY THE ROMANS, IN DETAILING SEPARATE GODS FOR
ALL THINGS AND ALL MOVEMENTS OF THE MIND, CHOSE TO HAVE THE TEMPLE OF QUIET
OUTSIDE THE GATES.
But I wonder very much, that while they assigned to separate gods single
things, and (well nigh) all movements of the mind; that while they invoked the
goddess Agenoria, who should excite to action; the goddess Stimula, who should
stimulate to unusual action; the goddess Murcia, who should not move men beyond
measure, but make them, as Pomponius says, murcid--that is, too slothful and
inactive; the goddess Strenua, who should make them strenuous; and that while
they offered to all these gods and goddesses solemn and public worship, they
should yet have been unwilling to give public acknowledgment to her whom they name
Quies because she makes men quiet, but built her temple outside the Colline
gate. Whether was this a symptom of an unquiet mind, or rather was it thus
intimated that he who should persevere in worshipping that crowd, not, to be sure, of
gods, but of demons, could not dwell with quiet; to which the true Physician
calls, saying, "Learn of me, for I am meek and lowly in heart, and ye shall find
rest unto your souls?"
CHAP. 17.--WHETHER, IF THE HIGHEST POWER BELONGS TO JOVE, VICTORIA ALSO OUGHT
TO BE WORSHIPPED.
Or do they say, perhaps, that Jupiter sends the goddess Victoria, and that
she, as it were acting in obedience to the king of the gods, comes to those to
whom he may have despatched her, and takes up her quarters on their side? This
is truly said, not of Jove, whom they, according to their own imagination,
feign to be king of the gods, but of Him who is the true eternal King, because he
sends, not Victory, who is no person, but His angel, and causes whom He pleases
to conquer; whose counsel may be hidden, but cannot be unjust. For if Victory
is a goddess, why is not Triumph also a god, and joined to Victory either as
husband, or brother, or son? Indeed, they have imagined such things concerning
the gods, that if the poets had reigned the like, and they should have been
discussed by us, they would have replied that they were laughable figments of the
poets not to be attributed to true deities: And yet they themselves did not laugh
when they were, not reading in the poets, but worshipping in the temples such
doating follies. Therefore they should entreat Jove atone for all things, and
supplicate him only. For if Victory is a goddess, and is under him as her king,
wherever he might have sent her, she could not dare to resist and do her own
will rather than his.
CHAP. 18.--WITH WHAT REASON THEY WHO THINK FELICITY AND FORTUNE GODDESSES HAVE
DISTINGUISHED THEM.
What shall we say, besides, of the idea that Felicity also is a goddess?
She has received a temple; she has merited an altar; suitable rites of worship
are paid to her. She alone, then, should be worshipped. For where she is
present, what good thing can be absent? But what does a man wish, that he thinks
Fortune also a goddess and worships her? Is felicity one thing, fortune another?
Fortune, indeed, may be bad as well as good; but felicity, if it could be bad,
would not be felicity. Certainly we ought to think all the gods of either sex (if
they also have sex) are only good. This says Plato; this say other
philosophers; this say all estimable rulers of the republic and the nations. How is it,
then, that the goddess Fortune is sometimes good, sometimes bad? Is it perhaps the
case that when she is bad she is not a goddess, but is suddenly changed into a
malignant demon? How many Fortunes are there then? Just as many as there are
men who are fortunate, that is, of good fortune. But since there must also be
very many others who at the very same time are men of bad fortune, could she,
being one and the same Fortune, be at the same time both bad and good--the one to
these, the other to those? She who is the goddess, is she always good? Then
she herself is felicity. Why, then, are two names given her? Yet this is
tolerable; for it is customary that one thing should be called by two names. But why
different temples, different altars, different rituals? There is a reason, say
they, because Felicity is she whom the good have by previous merit; but fortune,
which is termed good without any trial of merit, befalls both good and bad men
fortuitously, whence also she is named Fortune. How, therefore, is she good,
who without any discernment comes-both to the good and to the bad? Why is she
worshipped, who is thus blind, running at random on any one whatever, so that for
the most part she passes by her worshippers, and cleaves to those who despise
her? Or if her worshippers profit somewhat, so that they are seen by her and
loved, then she follows merit, and does not come fortuitously. What, then, becomes
Of that definition of fortune? What becomes of the opinion that she has
received her very name from fortuitous events? For it profits one nothing to worship
her if she is truly fortune. But if she distinguishes her worshippers, so that
she may benefit them, she is not fortune. Or does, Jupiter send her too,
whither he pleases? Then let him alone be worshipped; because Fortune is not able to
resist him when he commands her, and sends her where he pleases. Or, at least,
let the bad worship her, who do not choose to have merit by which the goddess
Felicity might be invited.
CHAP. 19.--CONCERNING FORTUNA MULIEBRIS.(1)
To this supposed deity, whom they call Fortuna, they ascribe so much,
indeed, that they have a tradition that the image of her, which was dedicated by
the Roman matrons, and called Fortuna Muliebris, has spoken, and has said, once
and again, that the matrons pleased her by their homage; which, indeed, if it is
true, ought not to excite our wonder. For it is not so difficult for malignant
demons to deceive, and they ought the rather to advert to their wits and
wiles, because it is that goddess who comes by haphazard who has spoken, and not she
who comes to reward merit. For Fortuna was loquacious, and Felicitas mute; and
for what other reason but that men might not care to live rightly, having made
Fortuna their friend, who could make them fortunate without any good desert?
And truly, if Fortuna speaks, she should at least speak, not with a womanly, but
with a manly voice; lest they themselves who have dedicated the image should
think so great a miracle has been wrought by feminine loquacity.
CHAP. 20 --CONCERNING VIRTUE AND FAITH, WHICH THE PAGANS HAVE HONORED WITH
TEMPLES AND SACRED RITES, PASSING BY OTHER GOOD QUALITIES, WHICH OUGHT LIKEWISE TO
HAVE BEEN WORSHIPPED, IF DEITY WAS RIGHTLY ATTRIBUTED TO THESE.
They have made Virtue also a goddess, which, indeed, if it could be a
goddess, had been preferable to many. And now, because it is not a goddess, but a
gift of God, let it be obtained by prayer from Him, by whom alone it can be
given, and the whole crowd of false gods vanishes. But why is Faith believed to be
a goddess, and why does she herself receive temple and altar? For whoever
prudently acknowledges her makes his own self an abode for her. But how do they know
what faith is, of which it is the prime and greatest function that the true
God may be believed in? But why had not virtue sufficed? Does it not include
faith also? Forasmuch as they have thought proper to distribute virtue into four
divisions--prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance--and as each of these
divisions has its own virtues, faith is among the parts of justice, and has the
chief place with as many of us as know what that saying means, "The just shall
live by faith."(1) But if Faith is a goddess, I wonder why these keen lovers of a
multitude of gods have wronged so many other goddesses, by passing them by,
when they could have dedicated temples and altars to them likewise. Why has
temperance not deserved to be a goddess, when some Roman princes have obtained no
small glory on account of her? Why, in fine, is fortitude not a goddess, who
aided Mucius when he thrust his right hand into the flames; who aided Curtius, when
for the sake of his country he threw himself headlong into the yawning earth;
who aided Decius the sire, and Decius the son, when they devoted themselves for
the army?--though we might question whether these men had true fortitude, if
this concerned our present discussion. Why have prudence and wisdom merited no
place among the gods? Is it because they are all worshipped under the general
name of Virtue itself? Then they could thus worship the true God also, of whom
all the other gods are thought to be parts. But in that one name of virtue is
comprehended both faith and chastity, which yet have obtained separate altars in
temples of their own.
CHAP. 21.--THAT ALTHOUGH NOT UNDERSTANDING THEM TO BE THE GIFTS OF GOD, THEY
OUGHT AT LEAST TO HAVE BEEN CONTENT WITH VIRTUE AND FELICITY.
These, not verity but vanity has made goddesses. For these are gifts of
the true God, not themselves goddesses. However, where virtue and felicity are,
what else is sought for? What can suffice the man whom virtue and felicity do
not suffice? For surely virtue comprehends all things we need do, felicity all
things we need wish for. If Jupiter, then, was worshipped in order that he might
give these two things,--because, if extent and duration of empire is something
good, it pertains to this same felicity,--why is it not understood that they
are not goddesses, but the gifts of God? But if they are judged to be goddesses,
then at least that other great crowd of gods should not be sought after. For,
having considered all the offices which their fancy has distributed among the
various gods and goddesses, let them find out, if they can, anything which could
be bestowed by any god whatever on a man possessing virtue, possessing
felicity. What instruction could be sought either from Mercury or Minerva, when Virtue
already possessed all in herself? Virtue, indeed, is defined by the ancients as
itself the art of living well and rightly. Hence, because virtue is called in
Greek <greek>a?reth</greek>, it has been thought the Latins have derived from
it the term art. But if Virtue cannot come except to the clever, what need was
there of the god Father Catius, who should make men cautious, that is, acute,
when Felicity could confer this? Because, to be born clever belongs to felicity.
Whence, although goddess Felicity could not be worshipped by one not yet born,
in order that, being made his friend, she might bestow this on him, yet she
might confer this favor on parents who were her worshippers, that clever children
should be born to them. What need had women in childbirth to invoke Lucina,
when, if Felicity should be present, they would have, not only a good delivery,
but good children too? What need was there to commend the children to the goddess
Ops when they were being born; to the god Vaticanus in their birth-cry; to the
goddess Cunina when lying cradled; to the goddess Rimina when sucking; to the
god Statilinus when standing; to the goddess Adeona when coming; to Abeona when
going away; to the goddess Mens that they might have a good mind; to the god
Volumnus, and the goddess Volumna, that they might wish for good things; to the
nuptial gods, that they might make good matches; to the rural gods, and chiefly
to the goddess Fructesca herself, that they might receive the most abundant
fruits; to Mars and Bellona, that they might carry on war well; to the goddess
Victoria, that they might be victorious; to the god Honor, that they might be
honored; to the goddess Pecunia, that they might have plenty money; to the god
Aesculanus, and his son Argentinus, that they might have brass and silver coin?
For they set down Aesculanus as the father of Argentinus for this reason, that
brass coin began to be used before silver. But I wonder Argentinus has not
begotten Aurinus, since gold coin also has followed. Could they have him for a god,
they would prefer Aurinus both to his father Argentinus and his grandfather
Aesculanus, just as they set Jove before Saturn. Therefore, what necessity was
there on account of these gifts, either of soul, or body, or outward estate, to
worship and invoke so great a crowd of gods, all of whom I have not mentioned, nor
have they themselves been able to provide for all human benefits, minutely and
singly methodized, minute and single gods, when the one goddess Felicity was
able, with the greatest ease, compendiously to bestow the whole of them? nor
should any other be sought after, either for the bestowing of good things, or for
the averting of evil. For why should they invoke the goddess Fessonia for the
weary; for driving away enemies, the goddess Pellonia; for the sick, as a
physician, either Apollo or AEsculapius, or both together if there should be great
danger? Neither should the god Spiniensis be entreated that he might root out the
thorns from the fields; nor the goddess Rubigo that the mildew might not
come,--Felicitas alone being present and guarding, either no evils would have
arisen, or they would have been quite easily driven away. Finally, since we treat of
these two goddesses, Virtue and Felicity, if felicity is the reward of virtue,
she is not a goddess, but a gift of God. But if she is a goddess, why may she
not be said to confer virtue itself, inasmuch as it is a great felicity to
attain virtue?
CHAP. 22.--CONCERNING THE KNOWLEDGE OF THE WORSHIP DUE TO THE GODS, WHICH
VARRO GLORIES IN HAVING HIMSELF CONFERRED ON THE ROMANS.
What is it, then, that Varro boasts he has bestowed as a very great
benefit on his fellow-citizens, because he not only recounts the gods who ought to be
worshipped by the Romans, but also tells what pertains to each of them? "Just
as it is of no advantage," he says, "to know the name and appearance of any man
who is a physician, and not know that he is a physician, so," he says, "it is
of no advantage to know well that AEsculapius is a god, if you are not aware
that he can bestow the gift of health, and consequently do not know why you ought
to supplicate him." He also affirms this by another comparison, saying, "No
one is able, not only to live well, but even to live at all, if he does not know
who is a smith, who a baker, who a weaver, from whom he can seek any utensil,
whom he may take for a helper, whom for a leader, whom for a teacher;"
asserting, "that in this way it can be doubtful to no one, that thus the knowledge of
the gods is useful, if one can know what force, and faculty, or power any god may
have in an thingFor from this we may be able," he says, "to know what god we
ought to call to, and invoke for any cause; lest we should do as too many are
wont to do, and desire water from Liber, and wine from Lymphs." Very useful,
forsooth ! Who would not give this man thanks if he could show true things, and if
he could teach that the one true God, from whom all good things are, is to be
worshipped by men?
CHAP. 23.--CONCERNING FELICITY, WHOM THE ROMANS, WHO VENERATE MANY GODS, FOR A
LONG TIME DID NOT WORSHIP WITH DIVINE HONOR, THOUGH SHE ALONE WOULD HAVE
SUFFICED INSTEAD OF ALL.
But how does it happen, if their books and rituals are true, and Felicity
is a goddess, that she herself is not appointed as the only one to be
worshipped, since she could confer all things, and all at once make men happy? For who
wishes anything for any other reason than that he may become happy? Why was it
left to Lucullus to dedicate a temple to so great a goddess at so late a date,
and after so many Roman rulers? Why did Romulus himself, ambitious as he was of
rounding a fortunate city, not erect a temple to this goddess before all
others? Why did he supplicate the other gods for anything, since he would have lacked
nothing had she been with him? For even he himself would neither have been
first a king, then afterwards, as they think, a god, if this goddess had not been
propitious to him. Why, therefore, did he appoint as gods for the Romans,
Janus, Jove, Mars, Picus, Faunus, Tibernus, Hercules, and others, if there were more
of them? Why did Titus Tatius add Saturn, Ops, Sun, Moon, Vulcan, Light, and
whatever others he added, among whom was even the goddess Cloacina, while
Felicity was neglected? Why did Numa appoint so many gods and so many goddesses
without this one? Was it perhaps because he could not see her among so great a
crowd? Certainly king Hostilius would not have introduced the new gods Fear and
Dread to be propitiated, if he could have known or might have worshipped this
goddess. For, in presence of Felicity, Fear and Dread would have disappeared,--I do
not say propitiated, but put to flight. Next, I ask, how is it that the Roman
empire had already immensely increased before any one worshipped Felicity? Was
the empire, therefore, more great than happy? For how could true felicity be
there, where there was not true piety? For piety is the genuine worship of the
true God, and not the worship of as many demons as there are false gods. Yet even
afterwards, when Felicity had already been taken into the number of the gods,
the great infelicity of the civil wars ensued. Was Felicity perhaps justly
indignant, both because she was invited so late, and was invited not to honor, but
rather to reproach, because along with her were worshipped Priapus, and
Cloacina, and Fear and Dread, and Ague, and others which were not gods to be
worshipped, but the crimes of the worshippers? Last of all, if it seemed good to worship
so great a goddess along with a most unworthy crowd, why at least was she not
worshipped in a more honorable way than the rest? For is it not intolerable that
Felicity is placed neither among the gods Consentes,(1) whom they allege to be
admitted into the council of Jupiter, nor among the gods whom they term
Select? Some temple might be made for her which might be pre-eminent, both in
loftiness of site and dignity of style. Why, indeed, not something better than is
made for Jupiter himself? For who gave the kingdom even to Jupiter but Felicity?
I am supposing that when he reigned he was happy. Felicity, however, is
certainly more valuable than a kingdom. For no one doubts that a man might easily be
found who may fear to be made a king; but no one is found who is unwilling to be
happy. Therefore, if it is thought they can be consulted by augury, or in any
other way, the gods themselves should be consulted about this thing, whether
they may wish to give place to Felicity. If, perchance, the place should already
be occupied by the temples and altars of others, where a greater and more lofty
temple might be built to Felicity, even Jupiter himself might give way, so
that Felicity might rather obtain the very pinnacle of the Capitoline hill. For
there is not any one who would resist Felicity, except, which is impossible, one
who might wish to be unhappy. Certainly, if he should be consulted, Jupiter
would in no case do what those three gods, Mars, Terminus, and Juventas, did, who
positively refused to give place to their superior and king. For, as their
books record, when king Tarquin wished to construct the Capitol, and perceived that
the place which seemed to him to be the most worthy and suitable was
preoccupied by other gods, not daring to do anything contrary to their pleasure, and
believing that they would willingly give place to a god who was so great, and was
their own master, because there were many of them there when the Capitol was
founded, he inquired by augury whether they chose to give place to Jupiter, and
they were all willing to remove thence except those whom I have named, Mars,
Terminus, and Juventas; and therefore the Capitol was built in such a way that
these three also might be within it, yet with such obscure signs that even the
most learned men could scarcely know this. Surely, then, Jupiter himself would by
no means despise Felicity, as he was himself despised by Terminus, Mars, and
Juventas. But even they themselves who had not given place to Jupiter, would
certainly give place to Felicity, who had made Jupiter king over them. Or if they
should not give place, they would act thus not out of contempt of her, but
because they chose rather to be obscure in the house of Felicity, than to be eminent
without her in their own places.
Thus the goddess Felicity being established in the largest and loftiest
place, the citizens should learn whence the furtherance of every good desire
should be sought. And so, by the persuasion of nature herself, the superfluous
multitude of other gods being abandoned, Felicity alone would be worshipped, prayer
would be made to her alone, her temple alone would be frequented by the
citizens who wished to be happy, which no one of them would not wish; and thus
felicity, who was sought for from all the gods, would be sought for only from her own
self. For who wishes to receive from any god anything else than felicity, or
what he supposes to tend to felicity? Wherefore, if Felicity has it in her power
to be with what man she pleases (and she has it if she is a goddess), what
folly is it, after all, to seek from any other god her whom you can obtain by
request from her own self! Therefore they ought to honor this goddess above other
gods, even by dignity of place. For, as we read in their own authors, the
ancient Romans paid greater honors to I know not what Summanus, to whom they
attributed nocturnal thunderbolts, than to Jupiter, to whom diurnal thunderbolts were
held to pertain. But, after a famous and conspicuous temple had been built to
Jupiter, owing to the dignity of the building, the multitude resorted to him in
so great numbers, that scarce one can be found who remembers even to have read
the name of Summanus, which now he cannot once hear named. But if Felicity is
not a goddess, because, as is true, it is a gift of God, that god must be sought
who has power to give it, and that hurtful multitude of false gods must be
abandoned which the vain multitude of foolish men follows after, making gods to
itself of the gifts of God, and offending Himself whose gifts they are by the
stubbornness of a proud will. For he cannot be free from infelicity who worships
Felicity as a goddess, and forsakes God, the giver of felicity; just as he cannot
be free from hunger who licks a painted loaf of bread, and does not buy it of
the man who has a real one.
CHAP. 24.--THE REASONS BY WHICH THE PAGANS ATTEMPT TO DEFEND THEIR WORSHIPPING
AMONG THE GODS THE DIVINE GIFTS THEMSELVES.
We may, however, consider their reasons. Is it to be believed, say they,
that our forefathers were besotted even to such a degree as not to know that
these things are divine gifts, and not gods? But as they knew that such things are
granted to no one, except by some god freely bestowing them, they called the
gods whose names they did not find out by the names of those things which they
deemed to be given by them; sometimes slightly altering the name for that
purpose, as, for example, from war they have named Bellona, not bellum; from cradles,
Cunina, not cunoe; from standing corn, Segetia, not seges; from apples,
Pomona, not pomum; from oxen, Bubona, not bos. Sometimes, again, with no alteration
of the word, just as the things themselves are named, so that the goddess who
gives money is called Pecunia, and money is not thought to be itself a goddess:
so of Virtus, who gives virtue; Honor, who gives honor; Concordia, who gives
concord; Victoria, who gives victory. So, they say, when Felicitas is called a
goddess, what is meant is not the thing itself which is given, but that deity by
whom felicity is given.
CHAP. 25.--CONCERNING THE ONE GOD ONLY TO BE WORSHIPPED, WHO, ALTHOUGH HIS
NAME IS UNKNOWN, IS YET DEEMED TO BE THE GIVER OF FELICITY.
Having had that reason rendered to us, we shall perhaps much more easily
persuade, as we wish, those whose heart has not become too much hardened. For if
now human infirmity has perceived that felicity cannot be given except by some
god; if this was perceived by those who worshipped so many gods, at whose head
they set Jupiter himself; if, in their ignorance of the name of Him by whom
felicity was given, they agreed to call Him by the name of that very thing which
they believed He gave;--then it follows that they thought that felicity could
not be given even by Jupiter himself, whom they already worshipped, but
certainly by him whom they thought fit to worship under the name of Felicity itself. I
thoroughly affirm the statement that they believed felicity to be given by a
certain God whom they knew not: let Him therefore be sought after, let Him be
worshipped, and it is enough. Let the train of innumerable demons be repudiated,
and let this God suffice every man whom his gift suffices. For him, I say, God
the giver of felicity will not be enough to worship, for whom felicity itself is
not enough to receive. But let him for whom it suffices (and man has nothing
more he ought to wish for) serve the one God, the giver of felicity. This God is
not he whom they call Jupiter. For if they acknowledged him to be the giver of
felicity, they would not seek, under the name of Felicity itself, for another
god or goddess by whom felicity might be given; nor could they tolerate that
Jupiter himself should be worshipped with such infamous attributes. For he is
said to be the debaucher of the wives of others; he is the shameless lover and
ravisher of a beautiful boy.
CHAP. 26.--OF THE SCENIC PLAYS, THE CELEBRATION OF WHICH THE GODS HAVE EXACTED
FROM THEIR WORSHIPPERS.
"But," says Cicero, "Homer invented these things, and transferred things
human to the gods: I would rather transfer things divine to us."(1) The poet, by
ascribing such crimes to the gods, has justly displeased the grave man. Why,
then, are the scenic plays, where these crimes are habitually spoken of, acted,
exhibited, in honor of the gods, reckoned among things divine by the most
learned men? Cicero should exclaim, not against the inventions of the poets, but
against the customs of the ancients. Would not they have exclaimed in reply, What
have we done? The gods themselves have loudly demanded that these plays should
be exhibited in their honor, have fiercely exacted them, have menaced
destruction unless this was performed, have avenged its neglect with great severity, and
have manifested pleasure at the reparation of such neglect. Among their
virtuous and wonderful deeds the following is related. It was announced in a dream to
Titus Latinius, a Roman rustic, that he should go to the senate and tell them
to recommence the games of Rome, because on the first day of their celebration
a condemned criminal had been led to punishment in sight of the people, an
incident so sad as to disturb the gods who were seeking amusement from the games.
And when the peasant who had received this intimation was afraid on the
following day to deliver it to the senate, it was renewed next night in a severer form:
he lost his son, because of his neglect. On the third night he was warned that
a yet graver punishment was impending, if he should still refuse obedience.
When even thus he did not dare to obey, he fell into a virulent and horrible
disease. But then, on the advice of his friends, he gave information to the
magistrates, and was carried in a litter into the senate, and having, on declaring his
dream, immediately recovered strength, went away on his own feet whole.(2) The
senate, amazed at so great a miracle, decreed that the games should be renewed
at fourfold cost. What sensible man does not see that men, being put upon by
malignant demons, from whose domination nothing save the grace of God through
Jesus Christ our Lord sets free, have been compelled by force to exhibit to such
gods as these, plays which, if well advised, they should condemn as shameful?
Certain it is that in these plays the poetic crimes of the gods are celebrated,
yet they are plays which were re-established by decree of the senate, under
compulsion of the gods. In these plays the most shameless actors celebrated
Jupiter as the corrupter of chastity, and thus gave him pleasure. If that was a
fiction, he would have been moved to anger; but if he was delighted with the
representation of his crimes, even although fabulous, then, when he happened to be
worshipped, who but the devil could be served? Is it so that he could found,
extend, and preserve the Roman empire, who was more vile than any Roman man
whatever, to whom such things were displeasing? Could he give felicity who was so
infelicitously worshipped, and who, unless he should be thus worshipped, was yet
more infelicitously provoked to anger?
CHAP. 27. -- CONCERNING THE THREE KINDS OF GODS ABOUT WHICH THE PONTIFF
SCAEVOLA HAS DISCOURSED.
It is recorded that the very learned pontiff Scaevola(3) had distinguished
about three kinds of gods--one introduced by the poets, another by the
philosophers, another by the statesmen. The first kind he declares to be trifling,
because many unworthy things have been invented by the poets concerning the gods;
the second does not suit states, because it contains some things that are
superfluous, and some, too, which it would be prejudicial for the people to know. It
is no great matter about the superfluous things, for it is a common saying of
skillful lawyers, "Superfluous things do no harm."(4) But what are those things
which do harm when brought before the multitude? "These," he says, "that
Hercules, AEsculapius, Castor and Pollux, are not gods; for it is declared by
learned men that these were but men, and yielded to the common lot of mortals." What
else? "That states have not the true images of the gods; because the true God
has neither sex, nor age, nor definite corporeal members." The pontiff is not
willing that the people should know these things; for he does not think they are
false. He thinks it expedient, therefore, that states should be deceived in
matters of religion; which Varro himself does not even hesitate to say in his
books about things divine. Excellent religion ! to which the weak, who requires to
be delivered, may flee for succor; and when he seeks for the truth by which he
may be delivered, it is believed to be expedient for him that he be deceived.
And, truly, in these same books, Scaevola is not silent as to his reason for
rejecting the poetic sort of gods,--to wit, "because they so disfigure the gods
that they could not bear comparison even with good men, when they make one to
commit theft, another adultery; or, again, to say or do something else basely and
foolishly; as that three goddesses contested (with each other) the prize of
beauty, and the two vanquished by Venus destroyed Troy; that Jupiter turned
himself into a bull or swan that he might copulate with some one; that a goddess
married a man, and Saturn devoured his children; that, in fine, there is nothing
that could be imagined, either of the miraculous or vicious, which may not be
found there, and yet is far removed from the nature of the gods." O chief pontiff
Scaevola, take away the plays if thou art able; instruct the people that they
may not offer such honors to the immortal gods, in which, if they like, they may
admire the crimes of the gods, and, so far as it is possible, may, if they
please, imitate them. But if the people shall have answered thee, You, O pontiff,
have brought these things in among us, then ask the gods themselves at whose
instigation you have ordered these things, that they may not order such things to
be offered to them. For if they are bad, and therefore in no way to be
believed concerning the majority of the gods, the greater is the wrong done the gods
about whom they are feigned with impunity. But they do not hear thee, they are
demons, they teach wicked things, they rejoice in vile things; not only do they
not count it a wrong if these things are feigned about them, but it is a wrong
they are quite unable to bear if they are not acted at their stated festivals.
But now, if thou wouldst call on Jupiter against them, chiefly for that reason
that more of his crimes are wont to be acted in the scenic plays, is it not the
case that, although you call him god Jupiter, by whom this whole world is
ruled and administered, it is he to whom the greatest wrong is done by you, because
you have thought he ought to be worshipped along with them, and have styled
him their king?
CHAP. 28.--WHETHER THE WORSHIP OF THE GODS HAS BEEN OF SERVICE TO THE ROMANS
IN OBTAINING AND EXTENDING THE EMPIRE.
Therefore such gods, who are propitiated by such honors, or rather are
impeached by them (for it is a greater crime to delight in having such things said
of them falsely, than even if they could be said truly), could never by any
means have been able to increase and preserve the Roman empire. For if they could
have done it, they would rather have bestowed so grand a gift on the Greeks,
who, in this kind of divine things,--that is, in scenic plays,--have worshipped
them more honorably and worthily, although they have not exempted themselves
from those slanders of the poets, by whom they saw the gods torn in pieces,
giving them licence to ill-use any man they pleased, and have not deemed the scenic
players themselves to be base, but have held them worthy even of distinguished
honor. But just as the Romans were able to have gold money, although they did
not worship a god Aurinus, so also they could have silver and brass coin, and
yet worship neither Argentinus nor his father AEsculanus; and so of all the rest,
which it would be irksome for me to detail. It follows, therefore, both that
they could not by any means attain such dominion if the true God was unwilling;
and that if these gods, false and many, were unknown or contemned, and He alone
was known and worshipped with sincere faith and virtue, they would both have a
better kingdom here, whatever might be its extent, and whether they might have
one here or not, would afterwards receive an eternal kingdom.
CHAP. 29.--OF THE FALSITY OF THE AUGURY BY WHICH THE STRENGTH AND STABILITY OF
THE ROMAN EMPIRE WAS CONSIDERED TO BE INDICATED.
For what kind of augury is that which they have declared to be most
beautiful, and to which I referred a little ago, that Mars, and Terminus, and
Juventas would not give place even to Jove, the king of the gods? For thus, they say,
it was signified that the nation dedicated to Mars,--that is, the
Roman,--should yield to none the place it once occupied; likewise, that on account of the
god Terminus, no one would be able to disturb the Roman frontiers; and also, that
the Roman youth, because of the goddess Juventas, should yield to no one. Let
them see, therefore, how they can hold him to be the king of their god's, and
the giver of their own kingdom, if these auguries set him down for an adversary,
to whom it would have been honorable not to yield. However, if these things
are true, they need not be at all afraid. For they are not going to confess that
the gods who would not yield to Jove have yielded to Christ. For, without
altering the boundaries of the empire, Jesus Christ has proved Himself able to drive
them, not only from their temples, but from the hears of their worshippers.
But, before Christ came in the flesh, and, indeed, before these things which we
have quoted from their books could have been written, but yet after that auspice
was made under king Tarquin, the Roman army has been divers times scattered or
put to flight, and has shown the falseness of the auspice, which they derived
from the fact that the goddess Juventas had not given place to Jove; and the
nation dedicated to Mars was trodden down in the city itself by the invading and
triumphant Gauls; and the boundaries of the empire, through the falling away of
many cities to Hannibal, had been hemmed into a narrow space. Thus the beauty
of the auspices is made void, and there has remained only the contumacy against
Jove, not of gods, but of demons. For it is one thing not to have yielded, and
another to have returned whither you have yielded. Besides, even afterwards,
in the oriental regions, the boundaries of the Roman empire were changed by the
will of Hadrian; for he yielded up to the Persian empire those three noble
provinces, Armenia, Mesopotamia, and Assyria. Thus that god Terminus, who according
to these books was the guardian of the Roman frontiers, and by that most
beautiful auspice had not given place to Jove, would seem to have been more afraid
of Hadrian, a king of men, than of the king of the gods. The aforesaid provinces
having also been taken back again, almost within our own recollection the
frontier fell back, when Julian, given up to the oracles of their gods, with
immoderate daring ordered the victualling ships to be set on fire. The army being
thus left destitute of provisions, and he himself also being presently killed by
the enemy, and the legions being hard pressed, while dismayed by the loss of
their commander, they were reduced to such extremities that no one could have
escaped, unless by articles of peace the boundaries of the empire had then been
established where they still remain; not, indeed, with so great a loss as was
suffered by the concession of Hadrian, but still at a considerable sacrifice. It
was a vain augury, then, that the god Terminus did not yield to Jove, since he
yielded to the will of Hadrian, and yielded also to the rashness of Julian, and
the necessity of Jovinian. The more intelligent and grave Romans have seen these
things, but have had little power against the custom of the state, which was
bound to observe the rites of the demons; because even they themselves, although
they perceived that these things were vain, yet thought that the religious
worship which is due to God should be paid to the nature of things which is
established under the rule and government of the one true God, "serving," as saith
the apostle, "the creature more than the Creator, who is blessed for
evermore."(1) The help of this true God was necessary to send holy and truly pious men, who
would die for the true religion that they might remove the false from among
the living.
CHAP. 30.--WHAT KIND OF THINGS EVEN THEIR WORSHIPPERS HAVE OWNED THEY HAVE
THOUGHT ABOUT THE GODS OF THE NATIONS.
Cicero the augur laughs at auguries, and reproves men for regulating the
purposes of life by the cries of crows and jackdaws.(2) But it will be said that
an academic philosopher, who argues that all things are uncertain, is unworthy
to have any authority in these matters. In the second book of his De Natura
Deorum,(3) he introduces Lucilius Balbus, who, after showing that superstitions
have their origin in physical and philosophical truths, expresses his
indignation at the setting up of images and fabulous notions, speaking thus: "Do you not
therefore see that from true and useful physical discoveries the reason may be
drawn away to fabulous and imaginary gods? This gives birth to false opinions
and turbulent errors, and superstitions well-nigh old-wifeish. For both the
forms of the gods, and their ages, and clothing, and ornaments, are made familiar
to us; their genealogies, too, their marriages, kinships, and all things about
them, are debased to the likeness of human weakness. They are even introduced as
having perturbed minds; for we have accounts of the lusts, cares, and angers
of the gods. Nor, indeed, as the rabies go, have the gods been without their
wars and battles. And that not only when, as in Homer, some gods on either side
have defended two opposing armies, but they have even carried on wars on their
own account, as with the Titans or with the Giants. Such things it is quite
absurd either to say or to believe: they are utterly frivolous and groundless."
Behold, now, what is confessed by those who defend the gods of the nations.
Afterwards he goes on to say that some things belong to superstition, but others to
religion, which he thinks good to teach according to the Stoics. "For not only
the philosophers," he says, "but also our forefathers, have made a distinction
between superstition and religion. For those," he says, "who spent whole days in
prayer, and offered sacrifice, that their children might outlive them, are
called superstitious."(4) Who does not see that he is trying, While he fears the
public prejudice, to praise the religion of the ancients, and that he wishes to
disjoin it from superstition, but cannot find Out how to do so? For if those who
prayed and sacrificed all day were called superstitious by the ancients, were
those also called so who instituted (what he blames) the images of the gods of
diverse age and distinct clothing, and invented the genealogies of gods, their
marriages, and kinships? When, therefore, these things are found fault with as
superstitious, he implicates in that fault the ancients who instituted and
worshipped such images. Nay, he implicates himself, who, with whatever eloquence he
may strive to extricate himself and be free, was yet under the necessity of
venerating these images; nor dared he so much as whisper in a discourse to the
people What in this disputation he plainly sounds forth. Let us Christians,
therefore, give thanks to the Lord our God--not to heaven and earth, as that author
argues, but to Him who has made heaven and earth; because these superstitions,
which that Balbus, like a babbler,(1) scarcely reprehends, He, by the most deep
lowliness of Christ, by the preaching of the apostles, by the faith of the
martyrs dying for the truth and living with the truth, has overthrown, not only in
the hearts of the religious, but even in the temples of the superstitious, by
their own free service.
CHAP. 31.--CONCERNING THE OPINIONS OF VARRO, WHO, WHILE REPROBATING THE
POPULAR BELIEF, THOUGHT THAT THEIR WORSHIP SHOULD BE CONFINED TO ONE GOD, THOUGH HE
WAS UNABLE TO DISCOVER THE TRUE GOD.
What says Varro himself, whom we grieve to have found, although not by his
own judgment, placing the scenic plays among things, divine? When in many
passages he is horting, like a religious man, to the worship of the gods, does he
not in doing so admit that he does not in his own judgment believe those things
which he relates that the Roman state has instituted; so that he does not
hesitate to affirm that if he were founding a new state; he could enumerate the gods
and their names better by the rule of nature? But being born into a nation
already ancient, he says that he finds himself bound to accept the traditional
names and surnames of the gods, and the histories connected with them, and that
his purpose in investigating and publishing these details is to incline the
people to worship the gods, and not to despise them. By which, words this most acute
man sufficiently indicates that he does not publish all things, because they
would not only have been contemptible to himself, but would have seemed
despicable even to the rabble, unless they had been passed over in silence. I should be
thought to conjecture these things, unless he himself, in another passage, had
openly said, in speaking of religious rites, that many things are true which
it is not only not useful for the common people to know, but that it is
expedient that the people should think otherwise, even though falsely, and therefore
the Greeks have shut up the religious ceremonies and mysteries in silence, and
within walls. In this he no doubt expresses the policy of the so-called wise men
by whom states and peoples are ruled. Yet by this crafty device the malign
demons are wonderfully delighted, who possess alike the deceivers and the deceived,
and from whose tyranny nothing sets free save the grace of God through Jesus
Christ our Lord.
The same most acute and learned author also says, that those alone seem to
him to have perceived what God is, who have believed Him to be the soul of
the world, governing it by design and reason.(2) And by this, it appears, that
although he did not attain to the truth,--for the true God is not a soul, but the
maker and author of the soul,--yet if he could have been free to go against
the prejudices of custom, he could have confessed and counselled others that the
one God ought to be worshipped, who governs the world by design and reason; so
that on this subject only this point would remain to be debated with him, that
he had called Him a soul, and not rather the creator of the soul. He says,
also, that the ancient Romans, for more than a hundred and seventy years,
worshipped the gods without an image? "And if this custom," he says, "could have
remained till now, the gods would have been more purely worshipped." In favor of this
opinion, he cites as a witness among others the Jewish nation; nor does he
hesitate to conclude that passage by saying of those who first consecrated images
for the people, that they have both taken away religious fear from their
fellow-citizens, and increased error, wisely thinking that the gods easily fall into
contempt when exhibited under the stolidity of images. But as he does not say
they have transmitted error, but that they have increased it, he therefore wishes
it to be understood that there was error already when there were no images.
Wherefore, when he says they alone have perceived what God is who have believed
Him to be the governing soul of the world, and thinks that the rites of religion
would have been more purely observed without images, who fails to see how near
he has come to the truth? For if he had been able to do anything against so
inveterate, an error, he would certainly have given it as his opinion both that
the one God should be worshipped, and that He should be worshipped without an
image; and having so nearly discovered the truth, perhaps he might easily have
been put in mind of the mutability of the soul, and might thus have perceived
that the true God is that immutable nature which made the soul itself. Since these
things are so, whatever ridicule such men have poured in their writings
against the plurality of the gods, they have done so rather as compelled by the
secret will of God to confess them, than as trying to persuade others. If,
therefore, any testimonies are adduced by us from these writings, they are adduced for
the confutation of those who are unwilling to consider from how great and
malignant a power of the demons the singular sacrifice of the shedding of the most
holy blood, and the gift of the imparted Spirit, can set us free.
CHAP. 32.--IN WHAT INTEREST THE PRINCES OF THE NATIONS WISHED FALSE RELIGIONS
TO CONTINUE AMONG THE PEOPLE SUBJECT TO THEM.
Varro says also, concerning the generations of the gods, that the people
have inclined to the poets rather than to the natural philosophers; and that
therefore their forefathers,--that is, the ancient Romans,--believed both in the
sex and the generations of the gods, and settled their marriages; which
certainly seems to have been done for no other cause except that it was the business of
such men as were prudent and wise to deceive the people in matters of
religion, and in that very thing not only to worship, but also to imitate the demons,
whose greatest lust is to deceive. For just as the demons cannot possess any but
those whom they have deceived with guile, so also men in princely office, not
indeed being just, but like demons, have persuaded the people in the name of
religion to receive as true those things which they themselves knew to be false;
in this way, as it were, binding them up more firmly in civil society, so that
they might in like manner possess them as subjects. But who that was weak and
unlearned could escape the deceits of both the princes of the state and the
demons?
CHAP. 33.--THAT THE TIMES OF ALL KINGS AND KINGDOMS ARE ORDAINED BY THE
JUDGMENT AND POWER OF THE TRUE GOD.
Therefore that God, the author and giver of felicity, because He alone is
the true God, Himself gives earthly kingdoms both to good and bad. Neither does
He do this rashly, and, as it were, fortuitously,--because He is God not
fortune,--but according to the order, of things and times, which is hidden from us,
but thoroughly known to Himself; which same order of times, however, He does
not serve as subject to it, but Himself rules as lord and appoints as governor.
Felicity He gives only to the good. Whether a man be a subject or a king makes
no difference; he may equally either possess or not possess it. And it shall be
full in that life where kings and subjects exist no longer. And therefore
earthly kingdoms are given by Him both to the good and the bad; lest His
worshippers, still under the conduct of a very weak mind, should covet these gifts from
Him as some great things. And this is the mystery of the Old Testament, in which
the New was hidden, that there even earthly gifts are promised: those who were
spiritual understanding even then, although not yet openly declaring, both the
eternity which was symbolized by these earthly things, and in what gifts of
God true felicity could be found.
CHAP. 34.--CONCERNING THE KINGDOM OF THE JEWS, WHICH WAS FOUNDED BY THE ONE
AND TRUE GOD, AND PRESERVED BY HIM AS LONG AS THEY REMAINED IN THE TRUE RELIGION.
Therefore, that it might be known that these earthly good things, after
which those pant who cannot imagine better things, remain in the power of the one
God Himself, not of the many false gods whom the Romans have formerly believed
worthy of worship, He multiplied His people in Egypt from being very few, and
delivered them out of it by wonderful signs. Nor did their women invoke Lucina
when their offspring was being incredibly multiplied; and that nation having
increased incredibly, He Himself delivered, He Himself saved them from the hands
of the Egyptians, who persecuted them, and wished to kill all their infants.
Without the goddess Rumina they sucked; without Cunina they were cradled, without
Educa and Potina they took food and drink: without all those puerile gods they
were educated; without the nuptial gods they were married; without the worship
of Priapus they had conjugal intercourse; without invocation of Neptune the
divided sea opened up a way for them to pass over, and overwhelmed with its
returning waves their enemies who pursued them. Neither did they consecrate any
goddess Mannia when they received manna from heaven; nor, when the smitten rock
poured forth water to them when they thirsted, did they worship Nymphs and Lymphs.
Without the mad rites of Mars and Bellona they carried on war; and while,
indeed, they did not conquer without victory, yet they did not hold it to be a
goddess, but the gift of their God. Without Segetia they had harvests; without
Bubona, oxen; honey without Mellona; apples without Pomona: and, in a word,
everything for which the Romans thought they must supplicate so great a crowd of false
gods, they received much more happily from the one true God. And if they had
not sinned against Him with impious curiosity, which seduced them like magic
arts, and drew them to strange gods and idols, and at last led them to kill
Christ, their kingdom would have remained. to them, and would have been, if not more
spacious, yet more happy, than that of Rome. And now that they are dispersed
through almost all lands and nations, it is through the providence of that one
true God; that whereas the images, altars, groves, and temples of the false gods
are everywhere overthrown, and their sacrifices prohibited, it may be shown
from their books how this has been foretold by their prophets so long before;
lest, perhaps, when they should be read in ours, they might seem to be invented by
us. But now, reserving what is to follow for the following book, we must here
set a bound to the prolixity of this one.