HOMILIES OF ST. JOHN CHRYSOSTOM ON THE GOSPEL ACCORDING TO ST. MATTHEW,
HOMILIES IV TO VI (MATT. 1 & 2)
HOMILY IV.
MATT. I. 17.
"So all the generations from Abraham to David are fourteen generations, and
from David until the carrying away into Babylon are fourteen generations, and
from the carrying away into Babylon unto Christ are fourteen generations."
He hath divided all the generations into three portions, to indicate that
not even when their form of government was changed did they become better, but
alike under an aristocracy, and under a king, and under an oligarchy, they were
in the same evil ways, and whether popular leaders, or priests, or kings
controlled them, it was no advantage to them in the way of virtue.
But wherefore hath he in the middle portion passed over three kings, and
in the last, having set down twelve generations, affirmed them to be fourteen?
The former question I leave for you to examine;(1) for neither is it needful for
me to explain all things to you, lest ye should grow indolent: but the second
we will explain.(2) To me then he seems in this place to be putting in the
place of a generation, both the time of the captivity, and Christ Himself, by every
means connecting Him with us. And full well doth he put us in mind of that
captivity, making it manifest that not even when they went down thither, did they
become more sober-minded; in order that from everything His coming may be shown
to be necessary.
"Why then," one may say, "doth not Mark do this, nor trace Christ's
genealogy, but utter everything briefly?" It seems to me that Matthew was before the
rest in entering on the subject (wherefore he both sets down the genealogy with
exactness, and stops at those things which require it): but that Mark came
after him, which is why he took a short course, as putting his hand to what had
been already spoken and made manifest.(3)
How is it then that Luke not only traces the genealogy, but doth it
through a greater number? As was natural, Matthew having led the way, he seeks to
teach us somewhat in addition to former statements. And each too in like manner
imitated his master; the one Paul, who flows fuller than any river; the other
Peter, who studies brevity.
2. And what may be the reason that Matthew said not at the beginning, in
the same way as the prophet, "the vision which I saw," and "the word which came
unto me"? Because he was writing unto men well disposed, and exceedingly
attentive to him. For both the miracles that were done cried aloud, and they who
received the word were exceeding faithful. But in the case of the prophets, there
were neither so many miracles to proclaim them; and besides, the tribe of the
false prophets, no small one, was riotously breaking in upon them: to whom the
people of the Jews gave even more heed. This kind of opening therefore was
necessary in their case.
And if ever miracles were done, they were done for the aliens' sake, to
increase the number of the proselytes; and for manifestation of God's power, if
haply their enemies having taken them captives, fancied they prevailed, because
their own gods were mighty: like as in Egypt, out of which no small "mixed
multitude"(1) went up; and, after that, in Babylon, what befell touching the
furnace and the dreams. And miracles were wrought also, when they were by themselves
in the wilderness; as also in our case: for among us too, when we had just come
out of error, many wonderful works were shown forth; but afterwards they
stayed, when in all countries true religion had taken root.
And what took place at a later period(2) were few and at intervals; for
example, when the sun stood still in its course, and started back in the opposite
direction. And this one may see to have occurred in our case also. For so even
in our generation, in the instance of him who surpassed all in ungodliness, I
mean Julian, many strange things happened. Thus when the Jews were attempting
to raise up again the temple at Jerusalem, fire burst out from the foundations,
and utterly hindered them all; and when both his treasurer,(3) and his uncle
and namesake, made the sacred vessels the subject of their open insolence, the
one was "eaten with worms, and gave up the ghost,"(4) the other "burst asunder in
the midst." Moreover, the fountains failing,(5) when sacrifices were made
there, and the entrance of the famine into the cities together with the emperor
himself, was a very great sign. For it is usual with God to do such things; when
evils are multiplied, and He sees His own people afflicted, and their
adversaries greatly intoxicated with their dominion over them, then to display His own
power; which he did also in Persia with respect to the Jews.
3. Wherefore, that he was not acting without an object, or by chance, when
he distributed Christ's forefathers into three portions, is plain from what
hath been said. And mark, too, whence he begins, and where he ends. From Abraham
to David; from David to the captivity of Babylon; from this unto Christ
Himself. For both at the beginning he put the two in close succession, David and
Abraham, and also in summing up he mentions both in the same way. And this, because,
as I have already said, it was to them that the promises were made.
But why can it be, that as he mentioned the captivity of Babylon, he did
not mention also the descent into Egypt? Because they had ceased to be any
longer afraid of the Egyptians, but the Babylonians they dreaded still. And the one
thing was ancient, but the other fresh, and had taken place of late. And to the
one they were carried down for no sins, but to the other, transgressions were
the cause of their being removed.
And also with regard to the very names, if any one were to attempt to
translate their etymologies, even thence would he derive great matter of divine
speculation,(6) and such as is of great importance with regard to the New
Testament: as, for instance, from Abraham's name, from Jacob's, from Solomon's, from
Zorobabel's. For it was not without purpose that these names were given them. But
lest we should seem to be wearisome by running out a great length, let us pass
these things by, and proceed to what is urgent.
4. Having then mentioned all His forefathers, and ending with Joseph, he
did not stop at this, but added, "Joseph the husband of Mary;" intimating that
it was for her sake he traced his genealogy also. Then, lest when thou hast
heard of the "husband of Mary," thou shouldest suppose that Christ was born after
the common law of nature, mark, how he sets it right by that which follows.
"Thou hast heard," saith he, "of an husband, thou hast heard of a mother, thou hast
heard a name assigned to the child, therefore hear the manner too of the
birth. "The birth of Jesus Christ was on this wise."(7) "Of what kind of birth art
thou telling me, I pray thee, since thou hast already mentioned His ancestors?"
"I still wish to tell thee the manner also of His birth." Seest thou, how he
wakens up the hearer? For as though he were about to speak of something
unusual,(8) he promises to tell also the manner thereof.
And observe a most admirable order in the things he hath mentioned. For he
did not proceed directly to the birth, but puts us in mind first, how many
generations he was from Abraham, how many from David, and from the captivity of
Babylon; and thus he sets the careful hearer upon considering the times, to show
that this is the Christ who was preached by the prophets. For when thou hast
numbered the generations, and hast learnt by the time that this is He, thou wilt
readily receive likewise the miracle which took place in His birth. Thus, being
about to tell of a certain great thing, His birth of a virgin, he first
shadows over the statement, until he hath numbered the generations, by speaking of
"an husband of Mary;" or rather he doth even put in short space(1) the narration
of the birth itself, and then proceeds to number also the years, reminding the
hearer, that this is He, of whom the patriarch jacob had said, He should then
at length come, when the Jewish rulers had come to an end; of whom the prophet
Daniel had proclaimed beforehand, that He should come after those many weeks.
And if any one, counting the years spoken of to Daniel by the angel in a number
of weeks, would trace down the time from the building of the city to His birth,
by reckoning he will perceive the one to agree with the other.(2)
5. How then was He born, I pray thee? "When as His mother Mary was
espoused:"(3) He saith not "virgin," but merely "mother;" so that his account is easy
to be received. And so having beforehand prepared the hearer to look for some
ordinary piece of information, and by this laying hold of him, after all he
amazes him by adding the marvellous fact, saying, "Before they came together, she
was found with child of the Holy Ghost." He saith not, "before she was brought
to the bridegroom's house;" for indeed she was therein. It being the way of the
ancients for the most part to keep their espoused wives in their house:(4) in
those parts, at least, where one may see the same practised even now. Thus also
Lot's sons-in-law were in his house with him. Mary then herself likewise was in
the house with Joseph.
And wherefore did she not conceive before her espousal? It was, as I said
at first, that what had been done might be concealed awhile, and that the
Virgin might escape every evil suspicion. For when he, who had most right of all to
feel jealousy, so far from making her a show, or degrading her, is found even
receiving and cherishing her after her conception; it was quite clear that,
unless he had fully persuaded himself that what was done was of the operation of
the Holy Spirit, he would not have kept her with him, and ministered to her in
all other things. And most properly hath he said, that "she was 'found' with
child," the sort of expression that is wont to be used with respect to things
strange, and such as happen beyond all expectation, and are unlooked for.
Proceed therefore no further, neither require anything more than what hath
been said; neither say thou, "But how was it that the Spirit wrought this of a
virgin?" For if, when nature is at work, it is impossible to explain the
manner of the formation; how, when the Spirit is working miracles, shall we be able
to express these? And lest thou shouldest weary the evangelist, or disturb him
by continually asking these things, he hath said who it was that wrought the
miracle, and so withdrawn himself. "For I know," saith he, "nothing more, but
that what was done was the work of the Holy Ghost."
6. Shame on them who busy themselves touching the generation on high. For
if this birth, which hath witnesses without number, and had been proclaimed so
long a time before, and was manifested and handled with hands, can by no man be
explained; of what excess of madness do they come short who make themselves
busy and curious touching that unutterable generation? For neither Gabriel nor
Matthew was able to say anything more, but only that it was of the Spirit; but
how, of the Spirit, or in what manner, neither of them hath explained; for
neither was it possible.
Nor think that thou hast learnt all, by hearing "of the Spirit;" nay, for
we are ignorant of many things, even when we have learnt this; as, for
instance, how the Infinite is in a womb, how He that contains all things is carried, as
unborn, by a woman; how the Virgin bears, and continues a virgin. How, I pray
thee, did the Spirit frame that Temple? how did He take not all the flesh from
the womb, but a part thereof, and increased it, and fashioned it? For that He
did come forth of the Virgin's flesh, He hath declared by speaking of "that
which was conceived in her;"(5) and Paul, by saying, "made of a woman;" whereby he
stops the mouths of them(6) that say, Christ came among us as through some
conduit. For, if this were so, what need of the womb? If this were so, He hath
nothing in common with us, but that flesh is of some other kind, and not of the
mass which belongs to us. How then was He of the root of Jesse? How was He a rod?
how Son of man? how was Mary His mother? how was He of David's seed? how did he
"take the form of a servant?"(1) how "was the Word made flesh?"(2) and how
saith Paul to the Romans, "Of whom as concerning the flesh Christ came, who is God
over all?"(3) Therefore that He was of us, and of our substance,(4) and of the
Virgin's womb, is manifest from these things, and from others beside; but how,
is not also manifest. Do not either thou then inquire; but receive what is
revealed, and be not curious about what is kept secret.
7. "And Joseph her husband, being," saith he "a just man, and not willing
to make her a public example, was minded to put her away privily."(5)
Having said that it was of the Holy Ghost, and without cohabitation, he
establishes his statement in another way again.(6) Lest any one should say,
"Whence doth this appear? Who hath heard, who hath seen any such thing ever come to
pass?"--or lest you should suspect the disciple as inventing these things to
favor his Master;--he introduces Joseph as contributing, by what he underwent, to
the proof of the things mentioned; and by his narrative all but says, "If thou
doubt, me, and if thou suspect my testimony, believe her husband." For
"Joseph," saith he, "her husband, being a just man." By "a just man" in this place he
means him that is virtuous in all things. For both freedom from covetousness is
justice, and universal virtue is also justice;(7) and it is mostly in this
latter sense that the Scripture uses the name of justice; as when it saith, "a man
that was just and true;"(8) and again, "they were both just."(9) Being then
"just," that is good and considerate, "he was minded to put her away privily."
For this intent he tells what took place before Joseph's being fully informed,
that thou mightest not mistrust what was done after he knew. However, such a one
was not liable to be made a public example only, but that she should also be
punished was the command of the law. Whereas Joseph remitted not only that
greater punishment, but the less likewise, namely, the disgrace. For so far from
punishing, he was not minded even to make an example of her. Seest thou a man under
self-restraint, and freed from the most tyrannical of passions. For ye know
how great a thing jealousy is: and therefore He said, to whom these things are
clearly known, "For full of jealousy is the rage of a husband;"(10) "he will not
spare in the day of vengeance:" and "jealousy is cruel as the grave."(11) And
we too know of many that have chosen to give up their lives rather than fall
under the suspicion of jealousy. But in this case it was not so little as
suspicion, the burden of the womb entirely convicting her. But nevertheless he was so
free from passion as to be unwilling to grieve the Virgin even in the least
matters. Thus, whereas to keep her in his house seemed like a transgression of the
law, but to expose and bring her to trial would constrain him to deliver her to
die; he doth none of these things, but conducts himself now by a higher rule
than the law. For grace being come, there must needs henceforth be many tokens
of that exalted citizenship. For as the sun, though as yet he show not his
beams, doth from afar by his light illumine more than half(12) the world; so
likewise Christ, when about to rise from that womb, even before He came forth, shone
over all the world. Wherefore, even before her travail, prophets danced for joy,
and women foretold what was to come, and John, when he had not yet come forth
from the belly, leaped from the very womb. Hence also this man exhibited great
self-command, in that he neither accused nor upbraided, but only set about
putting her away.
8. The matter then being in this state, and all at their wits' end,(13)
the angel comes to solve all their difficulties. But it is worth inquiring, why
the angel did not speak sooner, before the husband had such thoughts: but, "when
he thought on it," not until then, he came; for it is said, "While he thought
on these things, the angel" comes. And yet to her he declares the good tidings
even before she conceived. And this again contains another difficulty; for even
though the angel had not spoken, wherefore was the Virgin silent, who had been
informed by the angel; and why, when she saw her betrothed husband in trouble,
did she not put an end to his perplexity?
Wherefore then did not the angel speak before Joseph became troubled. For
we must needs explain the former difficulty first. For what reason then did he
not speak? Lest Joseph should be unbelieving, and the same happen to him as to
Zacharias. For when the thing was visible, belief was thenceforth easy; but
when it had not yet a beginning, it was not equally easy to receive his saying.
For this reason the angel spake not at the first, and through the same cause the
Virgin too held her peace. For she did not think to obtain credit with her
betrothed husband, in declaring to him a thing unheard of, but rather that she
should provoke him the more, as though she were cloking a sin that had been
committed. Since if she herself, who was to receive so great a favor, is affected
somewhat after the manner of man, and saith, "How shall this be, seeing I know not
a man?"(1) much more would he have doubted; and especially when hearing it from
the woman who was under suspicion. Wherefore the Virgin saith nothing to him,
but the angel, the time demanding it, presents himself to him.
9. Why then, it may be asked, did he not so in the Virgin's case also, and
declare the good tidings to her after the conception? Lest she should be in
agitation and great trouble. For it were likely that she, not knowing the
certainty, might have even devised something amiss touching herself, and have gone on
to strangle or to stab herself, not enduring the disgrace. For wondrous indeed
was that Virgin, and Luke points out her excellency, saying, that when she
heard the salutation, she did not straightway pour herself out,(2) neither did she
accept the saying, but "was troubled," seeking "what manner of salutation this
might be."(3) Now she who was of such perfect delicacy would even have been
distracted with dismay at the thought of her shame, not expecting, by whatever she
might say, to convince any one who should hear of it, but that what had
happened was adultery. Therefore to prevent these things, the angel came before the
conception. Besides that, it was meet that womb should be free from trouble
which the Maker of all things entered; and the soul rid of all perturbation, which
was thought worthy to become the minister of such mysteries. For these reasons
He speaks to the Virgin before the conception, but to Joseph at the time of
travail.
And this many of the simpler sort, not understanding, have said there is a
discordance; because Luke saith it was Mary to whom he declared the good
tidings, but Matthew, that it was Joseph; not knowing that both took place. And this
sort of thing it is necessary to bear in mind throughout the whole history;
for in this way we shall solve many seeming discordances.
10. The angel then comes, when Joseph is troubled. For in addition to the
causes mentioned, with a view also to the manifestation of his self-command, he
defers his coming. But when the thing was on the point of taking place, then
at last he presents himself. "While he thought on these things, an angel
appeareth to Joseph in a dream."(4)
Seest thou the mildness of the husband? So far from punishing, he did not
even declare it to any one, no not even to her whom he suspected, but was
thinking it over with himself, as aiming to conceal the cause even from the Virgin
herself. For neither is it said that he was minded to "cast her out," but to
"put her away," so very mild and gentle was the man. "But while he is thinking on
these things, the angel appeareth in a dream."
And why not openly, as to the shepherds, and to Zacharias, and to the
Virgin? The man was exceedingly full of faith, and needed not this vision. Whereas
the Virgin, as having declared to her very exceeding good tidings, greater than
to Zacharias, and this before the event, needed also a marvellous vision; and
the shepherds, as being by disposition rather dull and clownish.(5) But this
man, after the conception,(6) when his soul was actually possessed with that evil
suspicion, and ready to exchange it for good hopes, if there appeared any one
to guide that way, readily receives the revelation. Wherefore he hath the good
tidings declared to him after his suspicion, that this selfsame thing might be
to him a convincing proof of the things spoken. I mean, that the fact of his
having mentioned it to no one, and his hearing the angel say the very things
which he thought in his mind, this afforded him an unquestionable sign that one had
come from God to say it. For to Him alone it belongs to know the secrets of
the heart.
Mark only, what a number of results are here. The man's self-command is
thoroughly shown; the word spoken in season contributes to his faith, and the
history is freed from suspicion, in that it shows him to have felt what it was
likely a husband would feel.
10. How then doth the angel assure him? Hear and marvel at the wisdom of
his words. For being come he saith, "Joseph, thou son of David, fear not to take
unto thee Mary thy wife." He straightway puts him in mind of David, of whom
the Christ was to spring, and he doth not suffer him to be greatly perturbed, by
the title of his forefathers, reminding him of the promise made to the whole
race. Else wherefore doth he call him "Son of David"?
"Fear not:" and yet in another case God doeth not so, but when one was
devising about a certain woman what he ought not, He spake the word more in a way
of rebuke, and with a threat.[1] And yet there too, the act was of ignorance,
for not with knowledge did that person take Sarah; yet nevertheless He rebuked
him: but here mildly. For exceeding great were the mysteries He was
dispensing,[2] and wide the interval between the two men; wherefore neither was there need
of rebuke.
But by saying, "fear not," he signifies him to have been afraid, lest he
should give offense to God, as retaining an adulteress; since, if it had not
been for this, he would not have even thought of casting her out. In all ways then
he points out that the angel came from God, bringing forward and setting
before him all, both what he thought to do, and what he felt in his mind.
Now having mentioned her name, he stayed not at this, but added also, "thy
wife;" whereas he would not have called her so, if she had been corrupted. And
here he calls her that is espoused "a wife;" as indeed the Scripture is wont
to call betrothed husbands sons-in-law even before marriage.
But what means, "to take unto thee?" To retain her in his house, for in
intention she had been now put away by him. "Her, being put away, do thou
retain," saith he, "as committed unto thee by God, not by her parents. And He commits
her not for marriage; but to dwell with thee; and by my voice doth He commit
her." Much as Christ Himself afterwards committed her to His disciple, so even
now unto Joseph.
12. Then having obscurely signified the matter in hand, he mentioned not
the. evil suspicion; but, in a manner more reverent and seemly, by telling the
cause of travail he removed this also; implying that the very thing which had
made him afraid, and for which he would have cast her out,--this very thing, I
say, was a just cause why he should take her and retain her in his house. Thus
more than entirely[3] doing away with his distress. "For she is not only free,"
saith he, "from unlawful intercourse, but even above all nature is her
conception. Not only therefore put away thy fear, but even rejoice more exceedingly,
'for that which is conceived in her is of the Holy Ghost.'"
A strange thing it was which he spake of, surpassing man's reason, and
above all the laws of nature. How then is he to believe, to whom such tidings are
altogether new? "By the things that are past," saith he, "by the revelations."
For with this intent he laid open all things that were in his mind, what he
felt, what he feared, what he was resolved to do;--that by these he might assure
himself of this point.
Or rather, not by things past only, but like wise by things to come, he
wins him over. "And she shall bring forth," saith he, "' a Son, and thou shall
call His name Jesus."[4] "For do not thou, because He is of the Holy Ghost,
imagine that thou art an alien to the ministry of this dispensation. Since although
in the birth thou hast no part, but the Virgin abode untouched, nevertheless,
what pertains to a father, not injuring the honor of virginity, that do I give
thee, to set a Name on that which is born: for "thou shalt call Him." For though
the offspring be not thine, yet shalt thou exhibit a father's care towards
Him. Wherefore I do straightway, even from the giving of the name, connect thee
with Him that is born."
Then lest on the other hand any one should from this suspect him to be the
father, hear what follows, with what exact care he states it. "She shall bring
forth," he saith, "a Son:" he doth not say, "bring forth to thee," but merely
"she shall bring forth," putting it indefinitely:[5] since not to him did she
bring forth, but to the whole world.
13. For this cause too the angel came bringing His name from Heaven,
hereby again intimating that this is a wondrous birth: it being God Himself who
sends the name from above by the angel to Joseph. For neither was this without an
object, but a treasure of ten thousand blessings. Wherefore the angel also
interprets it, and suggests good hopes, in this way again leading him to belief. For
to these things we are wont to be more inclined, and therefore are also fonder
of believing them.
So having established his faith by all, by the past things, by the future,
by the present, by the honor given to himself, he rings in the prophet also in
good time, to give his suffrage in support of all these. But before
introducing him, he proclaims beforehand the good things which were to befall the world
through Him. And what are these? Sins removed and done away.[1] "For He shall
save His people from their sins."
Here again the thing is signified to be beyond all expectation. For not
from visible wars, neither from barbarians, but what was far greater than these,
from sins, he declares the glad tidings of deliverance; a work which; had never
been possible to any one before.
But wherefore, one may ask, did he say, "His people," and not add the
Gentiles also? That he might not startle the hearer yet a while. For to him that
listens with understanding he darkly signified the Gentiles too. For "His people"
are not the Jews only, but also all that draw nigh and receive the knowledge
that is from Him.
And mark how he hath by the way discovered to us also His dignity, by
calling the Jewish nation "His people." For this is the word of one implying nought
else, but that He who is born is God's child, and that the King of those on
high is the subject of his discourse. As neither doth forgiving sins belong to
any other power. but only to that single essence.
14. Forasmuch then as we have partaken of so great a gift, let us do
everything not to dishonor such a benefit. For if even before this honor, what was
done was worthy of punishment, much more now, after this unspeakable benefit.
And this I say not now for no cause.[2] but because I see many after their
baptism living more carelessly than the uninitiated, and having nothing peculiar to
distinguish them in their way of life. It is, you see, for this cause, that
neither in the market nor in the Church is it possible to know quickly who is a
believer and who an unbehever; unless one be present at the time of the mysteries,
and see the one sort put out, the others remaining within. Whereas they ought
to be distinguished not by their place, but by their way of life. For as men's
outward[3] dignities are naturally to be discovered by the outward signs with
which they are invested, so ours ought to be discernible by the soul. That is,
the believer ought to be manifest not by the gift only, but also by the new
life. The believer ought to be the light and. salt of the world. But when thou dost
not give light even to thyself. neither bind up thine own gangrene, what
remains, whereby we are to know thee? Because thou hast entered the holy waters?
Nay, this to thee becomes a store[4] of punishment. For greatness of honor is, to
them who do not choose to live worthy of the honor, an increase of vengeance.
Yea, the believer ought to shine forth not only by what he hath received from
God, but also by what he himself hath contributed; and should be discernible by
everything, by.his gait, by his look, by his garb, by his voice. And this I have
said, not that display, but that the profit of beholders, may be the rule by
which we frame ourselves.
15. But now, what things soever I might seek to recognize thee by, I find
thee in all points distinguished by the contraries of the same. For whether by
thy place I would fain discern thee, I see thee spending thy day in horse
races, and theatres, and scenes of lawlessness, in the wicked assemblies in the
market places, and in companies of depraved men; or by the fashion of thy
countenance, I see thee continually laughing to excess, and dissolute as a grinning[5]
and abandoned harlot; or by thy clothes, I see thee in no better trim than the
people on the stage; or by thy followers, thou art leading about parasites and
flatterers; or by thy words, I hear thee say nothing wholesome, nothing
necessary, nothing of moment to our life; or by thy table, yet heavier from thence will
the charge against thee appear.
By what then, tell me, am I to recognize the believer[6] in thee, while
all the things I . have mentioned give the contrary sentence? And why do I say,
the believer? since I can not clearly make out whether thou art a man. For when
thou art like an ass, kicking, and like a bull, wantoning, and like a horse
neighing after women; when thou dost play the glutton like the bear, and pamper
thy flesh as the mule, and bear malice like the camel;[7] when thou dost raven as
a wolf, art wrathful as a serpent, stingest like a scorpion, and art crafty as
a fox, treasurest the poison of wickedness like an asp or a viper, and warrest
against thy brethren like that evil demon ;--how shall I be able to number
thee with men, not seeing in thee the marks of man's nature. Why, whilst I am
seeking the difference of catechumen and believer, I come near not to find even the
difference between a man and a will beast. For what shall I call thee? a wild
beast? Nay, the wild beasts are possessed by some one of these defects, but
thou heapest all together, and far surpassest their brutishness. Shall I then call
thee a devil?[1] Nay, a devil is not a slave to the dominion of the belly,
neither doth he set his love on riches. When therefore thou hast more faults than
either wild beasts or devils, how, I pray thee, shall we call thee a man? And
if thou art not to be styled a man, how shall we address thee as a believer?
16. And what is yet more grievous is this, that being in such evil case,
we have no idea whatever of the deformity of our own soul, nor discern the
hideousness thereof. And yet when thou art sitting at a hairdresser's, and having
thine hair cut, thou takest the mirror, and dost examine with care the
arrangement of thy locks, and askest them that stand by, and the haircutter himself, if
he hath well disposed what is on the forehead; and being old, for so it often
happens, art not ashamed of going wild with the fancies of youth: while of our
own soul, not only deformed, but transformed into a wild beast, and made a sort
of Scylla or Chimaera, according to the heathen fable, we have not even a slight
perception. And yet in this case too there is a mirror, spiritual, and far
more excellent, and more serviceable than that other one; for it not only shows
our own deformity, but transforms it too, if we be willing, into surpassing
beauty. This mirror is the memory of good men, and the history of their blessed
lives; the reading of the Scriptures; the laws given by God. If thou be willing
once only to look upon the portraitures of those holy men, thou will both see the
foulness of thine own mind, and having seen this, wilt need nothing else to be
set free from that deformity. Because the mirror is useful for this purpose
also, and makes the change easy.
Let no man therefore continue in the form of the irrational creatures. For
if the slave doth not enter into the father's house, how wilt thou, having
become even a wild beast, be able to set thy foot within those vestibules? And why
say I, a wild beast? Nay, such a one is more unmanageable than any wild beast.
For they, although by nature savage, yet when they have had the advantage of
man's art, oftentimes grow tame; but thou who hast changed their natural
wildness into this unnatural gentleness, what sort of plea wilt thou have, when thou
hast trained thine own natural meekness into the savageness that is contrary to
nature? when that which is wild by nature thou exhibitest in gentle mood, but
presentest thyself, by nature so gentle, unnaturally savage? and the lion[2]
thou tamest and makest tractable, but thine own wrath thou renderest wilder than
any lion. And yet in that case there are two hindrances, first that the beast is
deprived of reason, and then that it is the most wrathful of all things;
nevertheless by the excellency of the wisdom given to thee of God, thou dost
overcome even nature. Thou therefore, who in who beasts art victorious over nature
herself, how is it that in thine own case together with nature thou givest up
thine admirable quality of free will[3] also?
Further, if I were bidding thee make another man gentle, not even so ought
I to seem as one enjoining impossible things; however, thou mightest then
object that thou hast not the control of another's disposition, and that it doth
not altogether rest with thee. But now it is thine own wild beast, and a thing
which absolutely depends on thee. What plea then hast thou? or what fair excuse
wilt thou be able to put forth, turning as thou art a lion into a man, and
regardless that thou thyself art of a man becoming a lion; upon the beast bestowing
what is above nature, but for thyself not even preserving what is natural? Yea,
while the wild beasts are by thine earnest endeavors advanced into our noble
estate, thou art by thyself cast down from the throne of the kingdom, and thrust
out into their madness. Thus, imagine, if thou wilt, thy wrath to be a kind of
wild beast, and as much zeal as others have displayed about lions, so much do
thou in regard of thyself, and cause that way of taking things[4] to become
gentle and meek. Because this too hath grievous teeth and talons, and if thou tame
it not, it will lay waste all things. For not even lion nor serpent hath such
power to rend the vitals as wrath, with its iron talons continually doing so.
Since it mars, we see, not the body only, but the very health likewise of the
soul is corrupted by it, devouring, rending, tearing to pieces all its strength,
and making it useless for everything. For if a man nourishing worms in his
entrails, shall not be able so much as to breathe, his inward parts all wasting
away; how shall we. having so large a serpent eating up all within us (it is wrath
I mean), how, I say, shall we be able to produce anything noble?
17. How then are we to be freed from this pest? If we can drink a potion
that is able 5 to kill the worms within us and the serpents.' "And of what
nature," it will be asked, "may this potion be, that hath such power?" The precious
Blood of Christ, if it be received with full assurance,[1] (for this will have
power to extinguish every disease); and together with this the divine
Scriptures carefully heard, and almsgiving added to our hearing; for by means of all
these things we shall be enabled to mortify the affections that mar our soul. And
then only shall we live; for now surely we are in no better state than the
dead: forasmuch as it cannot be, that while those passions live, we should live
too, but we must necessarily perish. And unless we first kill them here, they will
be sure to kill us in the other life; or rather before that death they will
exact of us, even here, the utmost penalty. Yes, for every such passion is both
cruel and tyrannical and insatiable, and never ceases to devour us every day.
For "their teeth are the teeth of a lion,"[2] or rather even far more fierce. For
the lion, as soon as ever he is satisfied, is wont to leave the carcass that
hath fallen in his way; but these passions neither are satisfied, nor do they
leave the man whom they have seized, until they have set him nigh the devil. For
so great is their power, that the very service which Paul showed forth to
Christ,[3] despising both hell and the kingdom for His sake, even this same do they
require of them whom they have seized. For whether it be with the love of
women, or of riches, or of glory, that any one is entangled, he laughs at hell
thenceforth, and despises the kingdom, that he may work the will of these. Let us
not then doubt Paul when he saith that he so loved Christ. For when some are
found so doing service to their passions, how should that other afterwards seem
incredible? Yea, and this is the reason why our longing for Christ is feebler,
because all our strength is consumed on this love, and we rob, and defraud, and
are slaves to vainglory; than which what can be more worthless?
For though thou shouldest become infinitely conspicuous, thou wilt be
nothing better than the base: rather for this selfsame cause thou wilt even be
baser. For when they who are willing to give thee glory, and make thee illustrious,
do for this very cause ridicule thee, that thou desirest the glory which comes
of them, how can such instances fail to turn the contrary way in regard of
thee. For indeed this thing is among those which attract censure. So that even as
in the case of one desiring to commit adultery or fornication, should any one
praise or flatter him, by this very act he becomes an accuser. rather than a
commender of the person indulging such desires: so with regard to him who is
desirous of glory; when we all praise, it is accusation rather than praise which we
bestow on those who wish to be made glorious.
18. Why then bring upon thyself that, from which the very opposite is wont
to befall thee. Yea, if thou wilt be glorified, despise glory; so shall thou
be more illustrious than any. Why feel as Nebuchadnezzar felt? For he too set up
an image, thinking from wood and from a senseless figure to procure to himself
an increase of fame, and the living would fain appear more glorious by the
help of that which hath no life. Seest thou the excess of his madness; how,
thinking to do honor, he rather offered insult, to himself? For when it appears that
he is relying rather on the lifeless thing, than on himself and the soul that
lives in him, and when for this cause he advances the stock unto such high
precedence, how can he be other than ridiculous, endeavoring as he doth to adorn
himself, not by his way of living, but by planks of wood? Just as if a man should
think proper to give himself airs, because of the pavement of his house, and
his beautiful staircase rather than because he is a man. Him do many too amongst
us imitate now. For as he for his image, so some men claim to be admired for
their clothes, others for their house; or for their mules and chariots, and for
the columns in their house. For inasmuch as they have lost their being as men,
they go about gathering to themselves from other quarters such glory as is full
of exceeding ridicule.
But as to the noble and great servants of God, not by these means, but by
such as best became them, even by such did they shine forth. For captives as
they were, and slaves, and youths, and strangers, and stripped of all resources
of their own they proved at that time far more awful than he who was invested
with all these things. And while Nebuchadnezzar found neither so great an image.
nor satraps, nor captains of the host, nor endless legions, nor abundance of
gold, nor other pomp, enough to meet his desire, and to show him great; to these,
on the other hand, stripped of all this, their high self-restraint alone was
sufficient, and showed him that wore the diadem and the purple, as much inferior
in glory to those who had no such thing, as the sun is more glorious than a
pearl.[4] For they were led forth in the midst of the whole world, being at once
youths, and captives, and slaves, and straightway on their appearance the king
darted fire from his eyes, and captains, and deputies, and governors, and the
whole amphitheatre of the devil, stood around; and a voice of pipes from all
sides, and of trumpets, and of all music, borne up to Heaven, was sounding in
their ears, and the furnace burned up to a boundless height, and the flame reached
the very clouds, and all was full of terror and dismay. But none of these
things dismayed them, but they laughed it all to scorn, as they would children
mocking them, and exhibited their courage and meekness, and uttering a voice clearer
than those trumpets, they said, "Be it known unto thee, O king."[1] For they
did Not wish to affront the king, no not so much as by a word, but to declare
their religion[2] only. For which cause, neither did they extend their speech to
any great length, but set forth all briefly; "For there is," say they, "a God
in Heaven, who is able tO deliver us,"[3] "why showest thou me the multitude?
why the furnace? why the sharpened swords? why the terrible guards? our Lord is
higher and more might}, than all these."
Then when they considered that it was possible that God might be willing
even to permit them to be burnt; lest, if this should come to pass, they might
seem to be speaking falsehoods; they add this also and say, "If this happen not,
be it known unto thee, O king, that we serve not thy gods."[4] For had they
said, "Sins are the cause of His not delivering us, should He fail to deliver,"
they would not have been believed. Wherefore in this place they are silent on
that subject, though they speak of it in the furnace, again and again alleging
their sins. But before the king they say no such thing; only, that though they
were to be burnt, they would not give up their religion.
For it was not for rewards and recompenses that they did what they did,
but out of love alone; and yet they were in captivity too, and in slavery, and
had enjoyed no good thing. Yea, they had lost their country, and their freedom,
and all their possessions. For tell me not of their honors in the king's courts,
for holy and righteous as they were, they would have chosen ten thousand times
rather to have been beggars at home, and to have been partakers of the
blessings in the temple. "For I had rather," it is said, "be an outcast[5] in the
house of my God, than to dwell in the tents of sinners." And "one day in thy courts
is better than thousands."[6] They would have chosen then ten thousand times
rather to be outcasts at home, than kings in Babylon. And this is manifest, from
what they declare even in the furnace, grieving at their continuance in that
country. For although themselves enjoyed great honors, yet seeing the calamities
of the rest they were exceedingly vexed; and this kind of thing is most
especially characteristic of saints, that no glory, nor honor, nor anything else
should be more precious to them than their neighbor's welfare. See, for example,
how even when they were in a furnace, they made their supplication for all the
people. But we not even when at large bear our brethren in mind. And again, when
they were inquiring about the dreams? they were looking "not to their own but
the common good,"[8] for that they despised death they showed by many things
afterwards. But everywhere they put themselves forward, as wishing to prevail[9]
with God by importunity. Next, as not accounting themselves either to be
sufficient, they flee to the Fathers; but of themselves they said that they offer
nothing more than "a contrite ! spirit."[10]
19. These men then let us also imitate. Because now too there is set up a
golden i image, even the tyranny of Mammon. But let us not give heed to the
timbrels, nor to the flutes, nor to the harps, nor to the rest of the pomp of
riches; yea, though we must needs fall into a furnace of poverty, let us choose it,
rather than worship that idol, and there will be "in the midst a moist
whistling wind."[11] Let us not then shudder at hearing of "a furnace of poverty." For
so too at that time they that fell into the furnace were shewn the more
glorious, but they that worshipped were destroyed. Only then all took place at once,
but in this case some part will be accomplished here, some there, some both
here and in the day that is to come. For they that have chosen poverty, in order
that they might not worship mammon, will be more glorious both here and then,
but they that have been rich unjustly here, shall then pay the utmost penalty.
From this furnace Lazarus too went forth, not less glorious than those
children; but the rich man who was in the place of them that worshipped the image,
was condemned to hell.[1] For indeed what we have now mentioned was a type of
this. Wherefore as in this instance they who fell into the furnace suffered no
hurt, but they who sat without were laid hold of with great fierceness, so
likewise shall it be then. The saints walking through the river of fire shall
suffer no pain, nay they will even appear joyous; but they that have worshipped the
image, shall see the fire rest upon them fiercer than any wild beast, and draw
them in. So that if any one disbelieves hell, when he sees this furnace, let
him from the things present believe things to come, and fear not the furnace of
poverty, but the furnace of sin. For this is flame and torment, but that, dew[2]
and refreshment; and by this stands the devil, by that, angels wafting aside
the flame.
20. These things let them hear that are rich, that are kindling the
furnace of poverty. For though they shall not hurt those others, "the dew"[2] coming
to their aid; yet themselves they will render an easy prey to the flame, which
they have kindled with their own hands.
Then, an angel went down with those children; now, let us go down with[3]
them that are in the furnace of poverty, and by alms-deeds let us make a "dewy
air,"[2] and waft the flame quite aside, that we may be partakers of their
crowns also; that the flames of hell may likewise be scattered by the voice of
Christ saying, "Ye saw me an hungered, and fed me."[4] For that voice shall then be
with us instead of a "moist wind whistling"[2] through the midst of the flame.
Let us then go down with alms-giving, unto the furnace of poverty; let us
behold them that in self-restraint walk therein, and trample on the burning coals;
let us behold the marvel, strange and beyond thought, a man singing praise in a
furnace, a man giving thanks in fire, chained unto extreme poverty, yet
offering much praise to Christ. Since they, who bear poverty with thankfulness,
really become equal to those children. For no flame is so terrible as poverty, nor
so apt to set us on fire. But those children were not set on fire; rather, on
their giving thanks to the Lord, their bonds too were at once loosed. So likewise
now, if when thou hast fallen into poverty, thou art thankful, both the bonds
are loosened, and the flame extinguished; or · though it be not extinguished
(what is much more marvellous), it becomes a fountain stead of a flame: which
then likewise came to pass, and in the midst of a furnace they enjoyed a pure dew.
For the fire indeed it quenched not, but the burning of those cast in it
altogether hindered. This one may see in their case also who live by the rules of
wisdom,[5] for they, even in poverty, feel more secure than the rich.
Let us not therefore sit down without the furnace, feeling no pity towards
the poor; lest the same befall us as then befell those executioners. For if
thou shouldest go down to them, and take thy stand with the children, the fire
will no longer work thee any harm; but if thou shouldest sit above and neglect
them in the flame of their poverty, the flame will burn thee up. Go down
therefore into the fire, that thou mayest not be burnt up by the fire; sit not down
without the fire, lest the flame catch hold of thee. For if it should find thee
amongst the poor, it will depart from thee; but if alienated from them, it will
run upon thee quickly, and catch thee. Do not therefore stand off from them that
are cast in, but when the devil gives command. to cast them that have not
worshipped gold into the furnace of poverty, be not thou of them that cast others
in, but of them that are cast in; that-thou mayest be of 'the number of the
saved, and not of the burned. For indeed it is a most effectual dew, to be held in
no subjection by desire of wealth, to be associate with poor persons. These are
wealthier than all, who have trampled under foot the desire of riches.
Forasmuch as those children too, by despising the king at that time, became more
glorious than the king. And thou therefore, if thou despise the things of the world,
shalt become more honorable than all the world; like those holy men, "of whom
the world was not worthy."[6]
In order then to become worthy of the things in Heaven, I bid thee laugh
to scorn things present. For in this way thou shalt both be more glorious here,
and enjoy the good things to come, by the grace and love towards man of our
Lord Jesus Christ; to whom be glory and might for ever and ever. Amen.
HOMILY V.
MATT. I. 25, 23.
"Now all this was done, that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the
Lord by the Prophet, saying, Behold, a Virgin shall be with child, and shall
bring forth a Son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel."
I WEAR many say, "While we are here, and enjoying the privilege of
hearing, we are awed, but when we are gone out, we become altered men again, and the
flame of zeal is quenched." What then may be done, that this may not come to
pass? Let us observe whence it arises. Whence then doth so great a change in us
arise? From the unbecoming employment of our time, and from the company of evil
men. For we ought not as soon as we retire from the Communion,[1] to plunge into
business unsuited to the Communion, but as soon as ever we get home, to take
our Bible into our hands, and call our wife and children to join us in putting
together what we have heard, and then, not before, engage in the business of
life.[2]
For if after the bath you would not choose to hurry into the market place,
lest by the business in the market you should destroy the refreshment thence
derived; much more ought we to act on this principle after the Communion. But as
it is, we do the contrary, and in this very way throw away all. For while the
profitable effect of what hath been said to us is not yet well fixed, the great
force of the things that press upon us from without sweeps all entirely away.
That this then may not be the case, when you retire from the Communion,
you must account nothing more necessary than that you should put together the
things that have been said to you. Yes, for it were the utmost folly for us, while
we give up five and even six days to the business of this life, not to bestow
on things spiritual so much as one day, or rather not so much as a small part
of one day. See ye not our own children, that whatever lessons are given them,
those they study throughout the whole day? This then let us do likewise, since
otherwise we shall derive no profit from coming here, drawing water daily into a
vessel with holes, and not bestowing on the retaining of what we have heard
even so much earnestness as we plainly show with respect to gold and silver. For
any one who has received a few pence both puts them into a bag and sets a seal
thereon; but we, having given us oracles more precious than either gold or
costly stones, and receiving the treasures of the Spirit, do not put them away in
the storehouses of our soul, but thoughtlessly and at random suffer them to
escape from our minds. Who then will pity us after all this, plotting against our
own interests, and casting ourselves into so deep poverty? Therefore, that this
may not be so, let us write it down an unalterable law for ourselves, for our
wives, and for our children, to give up this one day of the week entire to
hearing, and to the recollection of the things we have heard. For thus with greater
aptness for learning shall we approach what is next to be said; and to us the
labor will be less, and to you the profit greater, when, bearing in memory what
hath been lately spoken, ye hearken accordingly to what comes afterwards. For
no little doth this also contribute towards the understanding of what is said,
when ye know accurately the connexion of the thoughts, which we are busy in
weaving together for you. For since it is not possible to set down all in one day,
you must by continued remembrance make the things laid before you on many days
into a kind of chain, and so wrap it about your soul: that the body of the
Scriptures may appear entire.
Therefore let us not either to-day go on to the subjects set before us,
without first recalling what was lately said to our memory.[3]
2. But what are the things set before us to-day? "Now all this was done,
that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord by the prophet, saying."
In a tone worthy of the wonder, with all his might he hath uttered his voice,
saying, "Now all this was done." For when he saw the sea and the abyss of the
love of God towards man, and that actually come to pass which never had been
looked for, and nature's laws broken, and reconciliations made, Him who is above
all come down to him that is lower than all, and "the middle walls of partition
broken,"[1] and the impediments removed, and many more things than these done
besides; in one word he hath put before us the miracle, saying, "Now all this
was done that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of the Lord." For, "think
not," saith he, "that these things are now determined upon; they were prefigured
of old." Which same thing, Paul also everywhere labors to prove.
And the angel proceeds to refer Joseph to Isaiah; in order that even if he
should, when awakened, forget his own words, as newly spoken, he might by
being reminded of those of the prophet, with which he had been nourished up
continually, retain likewise the substance of what he had said.[2] And to the woman he
mentioned none of these things, as being a damsel and unskilled in them, but
to the husband, as being a righteous man and one who studied the prophets, from
them he reasons. And before this he saith "Mary, thy wife;" but now, when he
hath brought the prophet before him, he then trusts him with the name of
virginity; for Joseph would not have continued thus unshaken, when he heard from him of
a virgin, unless[3] he had first heard it also from Isaiah. For indeed it was
nothing novel that he was to hear out of the prophets,[4] but what was
familiar to him, and had been for a long time the subject of his meditations. For this
cause the angel, to make what he said easy to be received, brings in Isaiah.
And neither here doth he stop, but connects the discourse with God. For he doth
not call the saying Isaiah's, but that of the God of all things. For this cause
he said not, "that it might be fulfilled which was spoken of Isaiah," but
"which was spoken of the Lord." For the mouth indeed was Isaiah's, but the oracle
was wafted from above.
3. What then saith this oracle? "Behold, a virgin shall be with child, and
shall bring forth a son, and they shall call His name Emmanuel."
How was it then, one may say, that His name was not called Emmanuel, but
Jesus Christ? Because he said not, "thou shalt call," but "they shall call,"
that is, the multitude, and the issue of events. For here he puts the event as a
name: and this is customary in Scripture, to substitute the events that take
place for names.
Therefore, to say, "they shall call" Him "Emmanuel," means nothing else
than that they shall see God amongst men. For He hath indeed always been amongst
men, but never so manifestly.
But if Jews are obstinate, we will ask them. when was the child called,
"Make speed to the spoil, hasten the prey?" Why, they could not say. How is it
then that the prophet said, "Call his name Maher-shalal-hash-baz?"[5] Because,
when he was born, there was a taking and dividing of spoils, therefore the event
that took place in his time is put as his name. And the city, too, it is said,
shall be called "the city of righteousness, the faithful city Sion."[6] And
yet we nowhere find that the city was called "righteousness," but it continued
to be called Jerusalem. However, inasmuch as this came to pass in fact, when the
city underwent a change for the better, on that account he saith it is so
called. For when any event happens which marks out him who brings it to pass, or
who is benefited by it, more clearly than his name, the Scripture[7] speaks of
the truth of the event as being a name to him.
4. But if, when their mouths are stopped on this point, they should seek
another, namely, what is said touching Mary's virginity, and should object to us
other translators,[8] saying, that they used not the term "virgin," but "young
woman;" in the first place we will say this, that the Seventy were justly
entitled to confidence above all the others. For these made their translation after
Christ's coming, continuing to be Jews, and may justly be suspected as having
spoken rather in enmity, and as darkening the prophecies on purpose; but the
Seventy, as having entered upon this work an hundred years or more before the
coming of Christ, stand clear from all such suspicion, and on account of the date,
and of their number, and of their agreement,(1) would have a better right to
be trusted.
But even if they bring in the testimony of those others, yet so the tokens
of victory would be with us. Because the Scripture is wont to put the word
"youth," for "virginity;" and this with respect not to women only, but also to
men. For it is said, "young men and maidens, old men with younger ones."(2) And
again, speaking of the damsel who is attacked, it saith, "if the young woman cry
out,"(3) meaning the virgin.
And what goes before also establishes this interpretation. For he doth not
merely say, "Behold, the Virgin shall be with child," but having first said,
"Behold, the Lord Himself shall give you a sign," then he subjoins, "Behold, the
Virgin shall be with child."(4) Whereas, if she that was to give birth was not
a virgin, but this happened in the way of marriage, what sort of sign would
the event be? For that which is a sign must of course be beyond the course of
common events, it must be strange and extraordinary; else how could it be a sign?
5. "Then Joseph, being raised from sleep, did as the angel of the Lord had
bidden him." Seest thou obedience, and a submissive mind? Seest thou a soul
truly wakened, and in all things incorruptible? For neither when he suspected
something painful or amiss could he endure to keep the Virgin with him; nor yet,
after he was freed from this suspicion, could he bear to cast her out, but he
rather keeps her with him, and ministers to the whole Dispensation.
"And took unto him Mary his wife." Seest thou how continually the
evangelist uses this word, not willing that that mystery should be disclosed as yet,
and annihilating that evil suspicion?
And when he had taken her, "he knew her not, till she had brought forth
her first-born Son."(5) He hath here used the word "till," not that thou
shouldest suspect that afterwards he did know her, but to inform thee that before the
birth the Virgin was wholly untouched by man. But why then, it may be said, hath
he used the word, "till"? Because it is usual in Scripture often to do this,
and to use this expression without reference to limited times. For so with
respect to the ark likewise, it is said, "The raven returned not till the earth was
dried up."(6) And yet it did not return even after that time. And when
discoursing also of God, the Scripture saith, "From age until age Thou art,"(7) not as
fixing limits in this case. And again when it is preaching the Gospel
beforehand, and saying, "In his days shall righteousness flourish, and abundance of
peace, till the moon be taken away,"(8) it doth not set a limit to this fair part
of creation. So then here likewise, it uses the word "till," to make certain
what was before the birth, but as to what follows, it leaves thee to make the
inference. Thus, what it was necessary for thee to learn of Him, this He Himself
hath said; that the Virgin was untouched by man until the birth; but that which
both was seen to be a consequence of the former statement, and was acknowledged,
this in its turn he leaves for thee to perceive; namely, that not even after
this, she having so become a mother, and having been counted worthy of a new
sort of travail, and a child-bearing so strange, could that righteous man ever
have endured to know her. For if he had known her, and had kept her in the place
of a wife, how is it that our Lord(9) commits her, as unprotected, and having no
one, to His disciple, and commands him to take her to his own home?
How then, one may say, are James and the others called His brethren? In
the same kind of way as Joseph himself was supposed to be husband of Mary. For
many were the veils provided, that the birth, being such as it was, might be for
a time screened. Wherefore even John so called them, saying, "For neither did
His brethren believe in Him."(10)
6. Nevertheless they, who did not believe at first, became afterwards
admirable, and illustrious. At least when Paul and they that were of his company
were come up to Jerusalem about decrees(11) they went in straightway unto James.
For he was so admired as even to be the first to be entrusted with the bishop's
office. And they say he gave himself up to such great austerity, that even his
members became all of them as dead, and that from his continual praying, and
his perpetual intercourse with the ground, his forehead became so callous as to
be in no better state than a camel's knees, simply by reason of his striking it
so against the earth.(1) This man gives directions to Paul himself, when he
was after this come up again to Jerusalem, saying,(2) "Thou seest, brother, how
many thousands there are of them that are come together." So great was his
understanding and his zeal, or rather so great the power of Christ. For they that
mock Him when living, after His death are so filled with awe, as even to die for
Him with exceeding readiness. Such things most of all show the power of His
resurrection. For this, you see, was the reason of the more glorious things being
kept till afterwards, viz. that this proof might become indisputable. For
seeing that even those who are admired amongst us in their life, when they are gone,
are apt to be forgotten by us; how was it that they, who made light of this
Man living, afterwards thought Him to be God, if He was but one of the many? How
was it that they consented even to be slain for His sake, unless they received
His resurrection on clear proof?
7. And these things we tell you, that ye may not hear only, but imitate
also his manly severity,(3) his plainness of speech, his righteousness in all
things; that no one may despair of himself, though hitherto he have been careless,
that he may set his hopes on nothing else, after God's mercy, but on his own
virtue. For if these were nothing the better for such a kindred, though they
were of the same house and lineage with Christ, until they gave proof of virtue;
what favor can we possibly receive, when we plead righteous kinsmen and
brethren, unless we be exceeding dutiful,(4) and have lived in virtue? As the prophet
too said, intimating the selfsame thing, "A brother redeemeth not, shall a man
redeem?"(5) No, not although it were(6) Moses, Samuel, Jeremiah. Hear, for
example, what God saith unto this last, "Pray not thou for this people, for I will
not hear thee."(7) And why marvellest thou if I hear not thee? "Though Moses
himself and Samuel stood before me,"(8) I would not receive their supplication for
these men." Yea, if it be Ezekiel who entreats, he will be told, "Though Noah
stand forth, and Job, and Daniel, they shall deliver neither sons nor
daughters."(9) Though the patriarch Abraham be supplicating for them that are most
incurably diseased, and change not, God will leave him and go His way,(10) that he
may not receive his cry in their behalf. Though again it be Samuel who is doing
this, He saith unto him, "Mourn not thou for Saul."(11) Though for his own
sister one entreat, when it is not fitting, he again shall have the same sort of
answer as Moses, "If her father had but spit in her face."(12)
Let us not then be looking open-mouthed towards others. For it is true,
the prayers of the saints have the greatest power; on condition however of our
repentance and amendment. Since even Moses, who had rescued his own brother and
six hundred thousand men from the wrath that was then coming upon them from God,
had no power to deliver his sister;(13) and yet the sin was not equal; for
whereas she had done despite but to Moses, in that other case it was plain
impiety, what they ventured on. But this difficulty I leave for you; while that which
is yet harder, I will try to explain.
For why should we speak of his sister? since he who stood forth the
advocate of so great a people had not power to prevail for himself, but after his
countless toils, and sufferings, and his assiduity for forty years, was prohibited
from setting foot on that land, touching which there had been so many
declarations and promises. What then was the cause? To grant this favor would not be
profitable, but would, on the contrary, bring with it much harm, and would be
sure to prove a stumbling-block to many of the Jews. For if when they were merely
delivered from Egypt, they forsook God, and sought after Moses, and imputed all
to him; had they seen him also lead them into the land of promise, to what
extent of impiety might they not have been cast away? And for this reason also,
let me add, neither was his tomb made known.
And Samuel again was not able to save Saul from the wrath from above, yet
he oftentimes preserved the Israelites. And Jeremiah prevailed not for the
Jews, but some one else he did haply cover from evil by his prophecy.(14) And
Daniel saved the barbarians from slaughter,(15) but he did not deliver the Jews from
their captivity.
And in the Gospels too we shall see both these events come to pass, not in
the case of different persons, but of the same; and the same man now
prevailing for himself and now given up. For he who owed the ten thousand talents,
though he had delivered himself from the danger by entreaty, yet again he prevailed
not,(16) and another on the contrary, who had before thrown himself away,
afterwards had power to help himself in the greatest degree.(1) But who is this? He
that devoured his Father's substance.
So that on the one hand, if we be careless, we shall not be able to obtain
salvation, no not even by the help of others; if, on the other hand, we be
watchful, we shall be able to do this by ourselves, and by ourselves rather than
by others. Yes; for God is more willing to give His grace to us, than to others
for us; that we by endeavoring ourselves to do away His wrath, may both enjoy
confidence towards Him, and become better men. Thus He had pity on the
Canaanitish woman, thus He saved the harlot, thus the thief, when there was none to be
mediator nor advocate.
8. And this I say, not that we may omit supplicating the saints, but to
hinder our being careless, and entrusting our concerns to others only, while we
fall back and slumber ourselves. For so when He said, "make to yourselves
friends,(2) he did not stop at this only, but He added, "of the unrighteous mammon;"
that so again the good work may be thine own; for it is nothing else but
almsgiving which He hath here signified. And, what is marvellous, neither doth He
make a strict account with us, if we withdraw ourselves from injustice. For what
He saith is like this: "Hast thou gained ill? spend well. Hast thou gathered by
unrighteousness? scatter abroad in righteousness." And yet, what manner of
virtue is this, to give out of such gains? God, however, being full of love to man,
condescends even to this and if we thus do, promises us many good things. But
we are so past all feeling, as not to give even of our unjust gain, but while
plundering without end, if we contribute the smallest part, we think we have
fulfilled all. Hast thou not heard Paul saying, "He which soweth sparingly, shall
reap also sparingly"?(3) Wherefore then dost thou spare? What, is the act an
outlay? is it an expense? Nay, it is gain and good merchandise. Where there is
merchandise, there is also increase; where there is sowing, there is also
reaping. But thou, if thou hadst to till a rich and deep soil, and capable of
receiving much seed, wouldest both spend what thou hadst, and wouldest borrow of other
men, accounting parsimony in such cases to be loss; but, when it is Heaven
which thou art to cultivate, which is exposed to no variation of weather, and will
surely repay thine outlay with abundant increase, thou art slow and backward,
and considerest not that it is possible by sparing to lose, and by not sparing
to gain.
9. Disperse therefore, that thou mayest not lose; keep not, that thou
mayest keep; lay out, that thou mayest save; spend, that thou mayest gain. If thy
treasures are to be hoarded, do not thou hoard them, for thou wilt surely cast
them away; but entrust them to God, for thence no man makes spoil of them. Do
not thou traffic, for thou knowest not at all how to gain; but lend unto Him who
gives an interest greater than the principal. Lend, where is no envy, no
accusation, nor evil design, nor fear. Lend unto Him who wants nothing, yet hath need
for thy sake; who feeds all men, yet is an hungered, that thou mayest not
suffer famine; who is poor, that thou mayest be rich. Lend there, where thy return
cannot be death, but life instead of death. For this usury is the harbinger of
a kingdom, that, of hell; the one coming of covetousness, the other of
self-denial; the one of cruelty, the other of humanity. What excuse then will be ours,
when having the power to receive more, and that with security, and in due
season, and in great freedom, without either reproaches, or fears, or dangers, we
let go these gains, and follow after that other sort, base and vile as they are,
insecure and perishable, and greatly aggravating the furnace for us? For
nothing, nothing is baser than the usury of this world, nothing more cruel. Why,
other persons' calamities are such a man's traffic; he makes himself gain of the
distress of another, and demands wages for kindness, as though he were afraid to
seem merciful, and under the cloak of kindness he digs the pitfall deeper, by
the act of help galling a man's poverty, and in the act of stretching out the
hand thrusting him down, and when receiving him as in harbor, involving him in
shipwreck, as on a rock, or shoal, or reef.
"But what dost thou require?" saith one; "that I should give another for
his use that money which I have got together, and which is to me useful, and
demand no recompense?" Far from it: I say not this: yea, I earnestly desire that
thou shouldest have a recompense; not however a mean nor small one, but far
greater; for in return for gold, I would that thou shouldest receive Heaven for
usury. Why then shut thyself up in poverty, crawling about the earth, and
demanding little for great? Nay, this is the part of one who knows not how to be rich.
For when God in return for a little money is promising thee the good things
that are in Heaven, and thou sayest, "Give me not Heaven, but instead of Heaven
the gold that perisheth," this is for one who wishes to continue in poverty. Even
as he surely who desires wealth and abundance will choose things abiding
rather than things perishing; the inexhaustible, rather than such as waste away;
much rather than little, the incorruptible rather than the corruptible. For so the
other sort too will follow. For as he who seeks earth before Heaven, will
surely lose earth also, so he that prefers Heaven to earth, shall enjoy both in
great excellency. And that this may be the case with us, let us despise all things
here, land choose the good things to come. For thus shall we obtain both the
one and the other, by the grace and love towards man of our Lord Jesus Christ;
to whom be glory and might for ever and ever. Amen.
HOMILY VI.
MATT. II. 1, 2.
"When Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea in the days of Herod the king,
behold, there came wise men from the east to Jerusalem, saying, Where is He that
is born King of the Jews? for we have seen His star in the east, and are come to
worship Him.'
We have need of much wakefulness, and many prayers, that we may arrive at
the interpretation of the passage now before us, and that we may learn who
these wise men were, and whence they came, and how; and at whose persuasion, and
what was the star. Or rather, if ye will, let us first bring forward what the
enemies of the truth say. Because the devil hath blown upon them with so. violent
a blast, as even from this passage try to arm them against the words of truth.
What then do they allege? "Behold," say they, "even when Christ was born a
star appeared; which is a sign that astrology may be depended on." How then,
if He had His birth according to that law, did He put down astrology, and take
away fate, and stop the mouths of demons, and cast out error, and overthrow all
such sorcery?
And what moreover do the wise men learn from the star of itself? That He
was King of the Jews? And yet He was not king of this kingdom; even as He said
also to Pilate, "My kingdom is not of this world." At any rate He made no
display of this kind, for He had neither guards armed with spear or shield, nor
horses, nor chariots of mules, nor any other such thing around Him; but He followed
this life of meanness and poverty, carrying about with Him twelve men of mean
estate.
And even if they knew Him to be a king, for what intent are they come? For
surely this is not the business of astrology, to know from the stars who are
born, but from the hour when men are born to predict what shall befall them: so
it is said. But these were neither present with the mother in her pangs, nor
did they know the time when He was born, neither did they, beginning at that
moment, from the motion of the stars compute what was to happen: but conversely,
having a long time before seen a star appear in their own country, they come to
see Him that was born.
Which circumstance in itself would afford a still greater difficulty even
than the former. For what reason induced them, or the hope of what benefits, to
worship one who was king so far off? Why, had He been to reign over
themselves, most assuredly not even so would the circumstance be capable of a reasonable
account. To be sure, if He had been born in royal courts, and with His father,
himself a king, present by Him, any one would naturally say, that they, from a
wish to pay court to the father, had worshipped the child that was born, and in
this way were laying up for themselves beforehand much ground of patronage.
But now when they did not so much as expect Him to be their own king, but of a
strange nation, far distant from their country, neither seeing Him as yet grown
to manhood; wherefore do they set forth on so long a journey, and offer gifts,
and this when dangers were sure to beset their whole proceeding? For both Herod,
when he heard it, was exceedingly troubled, and the whole people was
confounded on being told of these things by them.
"But these men did not foresee this." Nay, this is not reasonable. For let
them have been ever so foolish, of this they could not be ignorant, that when
they came to a city under a king, and proclaimed such things as these, and set
forth another king besides him who then reigned, they must needs be bringing
down on themselves a thousand deaths.
2. And why did they at all worship one who was in swaddling clothes? For
if He had been a grown man, one might say, that in expectation of the succor
they should receive from Him, they cast themselves into a danger which they
foresaw; a thing however to the utmost degree unreasonable, that the Persian, the
barbarian, and one that had nothing in common with the nation of the Jews, should
be willing to depart from his home, to give up country, and kindred, and
friends, and that they should subject themselves to another kingdom.
But if this be foolish, what follows is much more foolish. Of what nature
then is this? That after they had entered on so long a journey, and worshipped,
and thrown all into confusion, they went away immediately. And what sign at
all of royalty did they behold, when they saw a shed, and a manger, and a child
in swaddling clothes, and a poor mother? And to whom moreover did they offer
their gifts, and for what intent? Was it then usual and customary, thus to pay
court to the kings that were born in every place? and did they always keep going
about the whole world, worshipping them who they knew should become kings out of
a low and mean estate, before they ascended the royal throne? Nay, this no one
can say.
And for what purpose did they worship Him at all? If for the sake of
things present, then what did they expect to receive from an infant, and a mother of
mean condition? If for things future, then whence did they know that the child
whom they had worshipped in swaddling clothes would remember what was then
done? But if His mother was to remind Him, not even so were they worthy of honor,
but of punishment, as bringing Him into danger which they must, have foreseen.
Thence at any rate it was that Herod was troubled, and sought, and pried, and
took in hand to slay Him. And indeed everywhere, he who makes known the future
king, supposing him in his earliest age in a private condition, doth nothing
else than betray him to slaughter, and kindle against him endless warfare.
Seest thou how manifold the absurdities appear, if we examine these
transactions according to the course of human things and ordinary custom? For not
these topics only, but more than these might be mentioned, containing more matter
for questions than what we have spoken of. But lest, stringing questions upon
questions, we should bewilder you, come let us now enter upon the solution of
the matters inquired of, making a beginning of our solution with the star itself.
3. For if ye can learn what the star was, and of what kind, and whether it
were one of the common stars, or new and unlike the rest, and whether it was a
star by nature or a star in appearance only, we shall easily know the other
things also. Whence then will these points be manifest? From the very things that
are written. Thus, that this star was not of the common sort, or rather not a
star at all, as it seems at least to me, but some invisible power transformed
into this appearance, is in the first place evident from its very course. For
there is not, there is not any star that moves by this way, but whether it be the
sun you mention, or the moon, or all the other stars, we see them going from
east to west; but this was wafted from north to south; for so is Palestine
situated with respect to Persia.
In the second place, one may see this from the time also. For it appears
not in the night, but in mid-day, while the sun is shining; and this is not
within the power of a star, nay not of the moon; for the moon that so much
surpasses all, when the beams of the sun appear, straightway hides herself, and
vanishes away. But this by the excess of its own splendor overcame even the beams of
the sun, appearing brighter than they, and in so much light shining out more
illustriously.
In the third place, from its appearing, and hiding itself again. For on
their way as far as Palestine it appeared leading them, but after they set foot
within Jerusalem, it hid itself: then again, when they had left Herod, having
told him on what account they came, and were on the point of departing, it shows
itself; all which is not like the motion of a star, but of some power highly
endued with reason. For it had not even any course at all of its own, but when
they were to move, it moved; when to stand, it stood, dispensing(1) all as need
required: in the same kind of way as the pillar of the cloud, now halting and
now rousing up the camp of the Jews, when it was needful.
In the fourth place, one may perceive this clearly, from its mode of
pointing Him out. For it did not, remaining on high, point out the place; it not
being possible for them so to ascertain it, but it came down and performed this
office. For ye know that a spot of so small dimensions, being only as much as a
shed would occupy, or rather as much as the body of a little infant would take
up, could not possibly be marked out by a star. For by reason of its immense
height, it could not sufficiently distinguish so confined a spot, and discover it
to them that were desiring to see it. And this any one may see by the moon,
which being so far superior to the stars, seems to all that dwell in the world,
and are scattered over so great an extent of earth,--seems, I say, near to them
every one. How then, tell me, did the star point out a spot so confined, just
the space of a manger and shed, unless it left that height and came down, and
stood over the very head of the young child? And at this the evangelist was
hinting when he said, "Lo, the star went before them, till it came and stood over
where the young Child was."
4. Seest thou, by what store of proofs this star is shown not to be one of
the many, nor to have shown itself according to the order of the outward
creation? And for what intent did it appear? To reprove the Jews for their
insensibility, and to cut off from them all occasion of excuse for their willful
ignorance. For, since He who came was to put an end to the ancient polity, and to call
the world to the worship of Himself, and to be worshipped in all land and sea,
straightway, from the beginning, He opens the door to the Gentiles, willing
through strangers to admonish His own people. Thus, because the prophets were
continually heard speaking of His advent, and they gave no great heed, He made
even barbarians come from a far country, to seek after the king that was among
them. And they learn from a Persian tongue first of all, what they would not
submit to learn from the prophets; that, if on the one hand they were disposed to be
candid, they might have the strongest motive for obedience; if, on the other
hand, they were contentious, they might henceforth be deprived of all excuse.
For what could they have to say, who did not receive Christ after so many
prophets, when they saw that wise men, at the sight of a single star, had received
this same, and had worshipped Him who was made manifest. Much in the same way then
as He acted in the case of the Ninevites, when He sent Jonas, and as in the
case of the Samaritan and the Canaanitish women; so He did likewise in the
instance of the magi. For this cause He also said, "The men of Nineveh shall rise up,
and shall condemn:" and, "the Queen of the South shall rise up, and shall
condemn this generation:"(1) because these believed the lesser things, but the Jews
not even the greater.
"And wherefore," one may say, "did He attract them by such a vision?" Why,
how should He have done? Sent prophets? But the magi would not have submitted
to prophets. Uttered a voice from above? Nay, they would not have attended.
Sent an angel? But even him they would have hurried by. And so for this cause
dismissing all those means, God calleth them by the things that are familiar, in
exceeding condescension; and He shows a large and extraordinary star, so as to
astonish them, both at the greatness and beauty of its appearance, and the manner
of its course.
In imitation of this, Paul also reasons with the Greeks from an heathen
altar, and brings forward testimonies from the poets.(2) And not without
circumcision doth he harangue the Jews. Sacrifices he makes the beginning of his
instruction to them that are living under the law. For, since to every one what is
familiar is dear, both God, and the men that are sent by Him, manage things on
this principle with a view to the salvation of the world. Think it not therefore
unworthy of Him to have called them by a star; since by the same rule thou wilt
find fault with all the Jewish rites also, the sacrifices, and the
purifications, and the new moons, and the ark, and the temple too itself, For even these
derived their origin from Gentile grossness.(3) Yet for all that, God, for the
salvation of them that were in error, endured to be served by these things,
whereby those without were used to serve devils; only He slightly altered them;
that He might draw them off by degrees from their customs, and lead them towards
the highest wisdom. Just so He did in the case of the wise men also, not
disdaining to call them by sight of a star, that He might lift them higher ever after.
Therefore after He hath brought them, leading them by the hand, and hath set
them by the manger; it is no longer by a star, but by an angel that He now
discourses unto them. Thus did they by little and little become better men.
This did He also with respect to them of Ascalon, and of Gaza. For those
five cities too (when at the coming of the ark they had been smitten with a
deadly plague, and found no deliverance from the ills under which they lay)--the
men of them called their prophets, and gathered an assembly, and sought to
discover an escape from this divine scourge. Then, when their prophets said that they
should yoke to the ark heifers untamed, and having their first calves, and let
them go their way, with no man to guide them, for so it would be evident
whether the plague was from God or whether it was any accident which brought the
disease;--("for if," it is said, "they break the yoke in pieces for want of
practice, or turn where their calves are lowing, 'it is a chance that hath
happened;'(1) but if they go on right, and err not from the way, and neither the lowing
of their young, nor their ignorance of the way, have any effect on them, it is
quite plain that it is the hand of God that hath visited those cities:")--when,
I say, on these words of their prophets the inhabitants of those cities obeyed
and did as they were commanded, God also followed up the counsel of the
prophets, showing condescension in that instance also, and counted it not unworthy of
Himself to bring to effect the prediction of the prophets, and to make them
seem trustworthy in what they had then said. For so the good achieved was greater,
in that His very enemies themselves bore witness to the power of God; yea,
their own teachers gave their voice concerning Him. And one may see many other
such things brought about by God. For what took place with respect to the
witch,(2) is again like this sort of dispensation; which circumstance also you will now
be able to explain from what hath been said.
With respect to the star, we have said these things, and yet more perhaps
may be said by you; for, it is said, "Give occasion to a wise man, and he will
be yet wiser:"(3) but we must now come to the beginning of what hath been read.
5. And what is the beginning? "When Jesus was born in Bethlehem of Judaea,
in the days of Herod the king, behold, there came wise men from the east to
Jerusalem." While wise men followed under the auspices of a star, these believed
not, with prophets even sounding in their ears. But wherefore cloth he mention
to us both the time and the place, saying, "in Bethlehem," and "in the days of
Herod the king?" And for what reason doth he add his rank also? His rank,
because there was also another Herod, he who slew John: but that was a tetrarch,
this a king. And the place likewise, and the time, he puts down, to bring to our
remembrance ancient prophecies; whereof one was uttered by Micah, saying, "And
thou, Bethlehem, in the land of Judah, art by no means the least among the
princes of Judah;"(4) and the other by the patriarch Jacob, distinctly marking out
to us the time, and setting forth the great sign of His coming. For, "A ruler,"
saith he, "shall not fail out of Judah, nor a leader out of his loins, until He
come for whom it is appointed, and He is the expectation of the Gentiles."(5)
And this again is worth inquiry, whence it was that they came to entertain
such a thought, and who it was that stirred them up to this. For it doth not
seem to me to be the work of the star only, but also of God, who moved their
soul; which same kind of thing He did also in the case of Cyrus, disposing him to
let the Jews go. He did not however so do this as to destroy their free will,
since even when He called Paul from above by a voice, He manifested both His own
grace and Paul's obedience.
And wherefore, one may ask, did He not reveal this to all the wise men of
the East? Because all would not have believed, but these were better prepared
than the rest; since also there were countless nations that perished, but it was
to the Ninevites only that the prophet was sent; and there were two thieves on
the cross, but one only was saved. See at least the virtue of these men, not
only by their coming, but also by their boldness of speech. For so that they may
not seem to be a sort of impostors,(6) they tell who showed them the way, and
the length of their journey; and being come, they had boldness of speech: "for
we are come," that is their statement, "to worship Him:" and they were afraid
neither of the people's anger, nor of the tyranny of the king. Whence to me at
least they seem to have been at home also teachers of their countrymen.(7) For
they who here did not shrink from saying this, much more would they speak boldly
in their own country, as having received both the oracle from the angel, and
the testimony from the prophet.
6. But "when Herod," saith the Scripture, "had heard, he was troubled, and
all Jerusalem with him." Herod naturally, as being king, and afraid both for
himself and for his children; but why Jerusalem? Surely the prophets had
foretold Him a Saviour, and Benefactor, and a Deliverer from above. Wherefore then was
Jerusalem(1) troubled? From the same feeling which caused them before also to
turn away from God when pouring His benefits on them, and to be mindful of the
flesh-pots of Egypt, while in the enjoyment of great freedom.
But mark, I pray thee, the accuracy of the prophets. For this selfsame
thing also had the prophet foretold from the first,(2) saying, "They would be
glad, if they had been burnt with fire; for unto us a Child is born, unto us a Son
is given."(3)
But nevertheless, although troubled, they seek not to see what hath
happened, neither do they follow the wise men, nor make any particular inquiry; to
such a degree were they at once both contentious and careless above all men. For
when they had reason rather to pride themselves that the king was born amongst
them, and had attracted to Him the land of the Persians, and they were on the
point of having all subject to them, as though their affairs had advanced
towards improvement, and from the very outset His empire had become so glorious;
nevertheless, they do not even for this become better. And yet they were but just
delivered from their captivity there; and it was natural for them to think (even
if they knew none of those things that are high and mysterious, but formed
their judgment from what is present only), "If they thus tremble before our king
at His birth, much more when grown up will they fear and obey Him, and our
estate will be more glorious than that of the barbarians."
7. But none of these things thoroughly awakens them, so great was their
dullness, and with this their envy also: both which we must with exact care root
out of our mind; and he must be more fervent than fire who is to stand in such
an array. Wherefore also Christ said, "I am come to send fire on earth, and I
would it were already kindled."(4) And the Spirit on this account appears in
fire.
But we are grown more cold than a cinder, and more lifeless than the dead;
and this, when we see Paul soaring above the Heaven, and the Heaven of Heaven,
and more fervent than any flame, conquering and overpassing all things, the
things beneath, and the things above; the things present, and the things to come;
the things that are, and the things that are not.
But if that example be too great for thee, in the first place, this saying
itself cometh of sloth; for what had Paul more than thou, that thou shouldest
say emulation of him is to thee impossible? However, not to be contentious, let
us leave Paul, and consider the first believers, who cast away both goods and
gains, together with all worldly care and worldly leisure, and devoted
themselves to God entire, every night and day giving attendance on the teaching of the
word. For such is the fire of the Spirit, it suffers us not to have any desire
for the things that are here, but removes us to another love. For this cause,
he who hath set his love on such things as these, though what he hath must be
given away, or luxury or glory laughed to scorn, or his very soul yielded up, he
doeth all these things with perfect ease. For the warmth of that fire entering
into the soul casts out all sluggishness, and makes him whom it hath seized
more light than anything that soars; and thenceforth overlooking the things that
are seen, such a one abides in continual compunction, pouring forth
never-ceasing fountains of tears, and thence reaping fruit of great delight. For nothing so
binds and unites unto God as do such tears. Such a one, though he be dwelling
in the midst of cities, spends his time as in a desert, and in mountains and
woods; none of them that are present doth he see, neither feel any satiety of
such lamentations; whether it be for himself, or for the negligences of others,
that he is weeping. For this cause God blessed these above all the rest of men,
saying, "Blessed are they that mourn."
8. And how saith Paul, "Rejoice in the Lord alway?"(5) The joy he is
speaking of is what springs from those tears. For as men's joy for the world's sake
hath a sorrow(6) in the same lot with it, even so godly tears are a germ of
perpetual and unfading joy. In this way the very harlot became more honorable than
virgins when seized by this fire. That is, being thoroughly warmed by
repentance, she was thenceforth carried out of herself by her longing desire toward
Christ; loosing her hair, and drenching with her tears His holy feet, and wiping
them with her own tresses, and exhausting the ointment.(1) And all these were
outward resuits, but those wrought in her mind were far more fervent than these;
which things God Himself alone beheld. And therefore, every one, when he hears,
rejoices with her and takes delight in her good works, and acquits her of
every blame. But if we that are evil pass this judgment, consider what sentence she
obtained from that God who is a lover of mankind; and how much, even before
God's gifts, her repentance caused her to reap in the way of blessing.
For much as after a violent burst of rain, there is a clear open sky; so
likewise when tears are pouring down, a calm arises, and serenity, and the
darkness that ensues on our sins quite disappears. And like as by water and the
spirit, so by tears and confession are we cleansed the second time; unless we be
acting thus lot display and vanity: for as to a woman whose tears were of that
sort, I should call her justly condemnable, more than if she decked herself out
with(2) lines and coloring. For I seek those tears which are shed not for
display, but in compunction; those which trickle down secretly and in closets, and in
sight of no man, softly and noiselessly; those which arise from a certain
depth of mind, those shed in anguish and in sorrow, those which are for God alone;
such as were Hannah's, for "her lips moved," it is said, "but her voice was not
heard;"(3) however, her tears alone uttered a cry more clear than any trumpet.
And because of this, God also opened her womb, and made the hard rock a
fruitful field.
If thou also weep thus, thou art become a follower of thy Lord. Yea, for
He also wept, both over Lazarus, and over the city; and touching Judas He was
greatly troubled. And this indeed one may often see Him do, but nowhere laugh,
nay, nor smile but a little; no one at least of the evangelists hath mentioned
this. Therefore also with regard to Paul, that he wept, that he did so three
years night and day,(4) both he hath said of himself, and others say this of him;
but that he laughed, neither hath he said himself anywhere, neither hath so
much as one other of the saints, either concerning him, or any other like him; but
this is said of Sarah only,(5) when she is blamed, and of the son of Noe,
when for a freeman he became a slave.(6)
9. And these things I say, not to suppress(7) all laughter, but to take
away dissipation of mind. For wherefore, I pray thee, art thou luxurious and
dissolute, while thou art still liable to such heavy charges, and are to stand at a
fearful judgment-seat, and to give a strict account of all that hath been done
here? Yes: for we are to give an account both of what we have sinned
willingly, and what against our will:--for "whosoever shall deny me," saith He, "before
men, him will I also deny before my Father:"(8)--and surely such a denial is
against our will; but nevertheless it doth not escape punishment, but of it too
we have to give account:--both of what we know, and of what we do not know; "For
I know nothing by myself," saith one, "yet am I not hereby
justified:"(9)--both for what we have done in ignorance, and what in knowledge; "For I bear them
record," it is said, "that they have a zeal of God, but not according to
knowledge;"(10) but yet this cloth not suffice for an excuse for them. And when
writing to the Corinthians also he saith, "For I fear, lest by any means, as the
serpent beguiled Eve through his subtlety, so your minds should be corrupted from
the simplicity that is in Christ."(11)
The things then being so great, for which thou art to give account, dost
thou sit laughing and talking wittily, and giving thyself up to luxury? "Why,"
one may say, "if I did not so, but mourned, what would be the profit?" Very
great indeed; even so great, as it is not possible so much as to set it forth by
word. For while, before the temporal tribunals, be thy weeping ever so abundant,
thou canst not escape punishment after the sentence; here, on the contrary,
shouldest thou only sigh, thou hast annulled the sentence, and hast obtained
pardon. Therefore it is that Christ discourses to us much of mourning, and blesses
them that mourn, and pronounces them that laugh wretched. For this is not the
theatre for laughter, neither did we come together for this intent, that we may
give way to immoderate mirth, but that we may groan, and by this groaning
inherit a kingdom. But thou, when standing by a king, dost not endure so much as
merely to smile; having then the Lord of the angels dwelling in thee, dost thou not
stand with trembling, and all due self-restraint, but rather laughest,
oftentimes when He is displeased? And dost thou not consider that thou provokest Him
in this way more than by thy sins? For God is not wont to turn Himself away so
much from them that sin, as from those that are not awestruck after their
But for all this, some are of so senseless a disposition, as even after
these words to say, "Nay, far be it from me to weep at any time, but may God
grant me to laugh and to play all my days." And what can be more childish than this
mind? For it is not God that grants to play, but the devil. At least hear,
what was the portion of them that played. "The people," it is said, "sat down to
eat and drink, and rose up to play."(1) Such were they at Sodore, such were
they at the time of the deluge. For touching them of Sodom likewise it is said,
that "in pride, and in plenty, and in fullness of bread, they waxed wanton."(2)
And they who were in Noah's time, seeing the ark a preparing for so many years,
lived on in senseless mirth, forseeing nought of what was coming. For this
cause also the flood came and swept them all away, and wrought in that instant the
common shipwreck of the world.
Ask not then of God these things, which thou receivest of the devil. For
it is God's part to give a contrite and humbled heart, sober, self-possessed,
and awestruck, full of repentance and compunction. These are His gifts, forasmuch
as it is also of these things that we are most in need. Yes, for a grievous
conflict is at hand, and against the powers unseen is our wrestling; against "the
spiritual wickednesses"(3) our fight, "against principalities, against powers"
our warfare: and it is well for us, if when we are earnest and sober and
thoroughly awakened, we can be able to sustain that savage phalanx. But if we are
laughing and sporting, and always taking things easily, even before the conflict,
we shall be overthrown by our own remissness.
10. It becometh not us then to be continually laughing, and to be
dissolute, and luxurious, but it belongs to those upon the stage, the harlot women, the
men that are trimmed for this intent, parasites, and flatterers; not them that
are called unto heaven, not them that are enrolled into the city above, not
them that bear spiritual arms, but them that are enlisted on the devil's side.
For it is he, yea, it is he, that even made the thing an art, that he might
weaken Christ's soldiers, and soften the nerves of their zeal. For this cause he
also built theatres in the cities, and having trained those buffoons, by their
pernicious influence he causes that kind of pestilence to light upon the whole
city, persuading men to follow those things which Paul bade us flee, "foolish
talking and jesting."(4) And what is yet more grievous than these things is the
subject of the laughter. For when they that act those absurd things utter any
word of blasphemy or filthiness, then many among the more thoughtless laugh and
are pleased, applauding in them what they ought to stone them for; and drawing
down on their own heads by this amusement the furnace of fire. For they who
praise the utterers of such words, it is these above all who induce men so to speak:
wherefore they must be more justly accountable for the penalty allotted to
these things. For were there no one to be a spectator in such cases. neither would
there be one to act; but when they see you forsaking your workshops, and your
crafts, and your income from these, and in short everything, for the sake of
continuing there, they derive hence a greater forwardness, and exert a greater
diligence about these things.
And this I say, not freeing them from reproof, but that ye may learn that
it is you chiefly who supply the principle and root of such lawlessness; ye who
consume your whole day on these matters, and profanely exhibit the sacred
things of marriage, and make an open mock of the great mystery. For not even he who
acts these things is so much the offender, as thou art before him; thou who
biddest him make a play on these things, or rather who not only biddest him, but
art even zealous about it, taking delight, and laughing, and praising what is
done, and in every way gaining strength for such workshops of the devil.
Tell me then, with what eyes wilt thou after this look upon thy wife at
home, having seen her insulted there? Or how dost thou not blush being put in
mind of the partner of thy home, when thou seest nature herself put to an open
shame? Nay, tell me not, that what is done is acting; for this acting hath made
many adulterers, and subverted many families. And it is for this most especially
that I grieve, that what is done doth not so much as seem evil, but there is
even applause and clamor, and much laughter, at commission of so foul adultery.
What sayest thou? that what is done is acting? Why, for this selfsame reason
they must be worthy of ten thousand deaths, that what things all laws command men
to flee, they have taken pains to imitate. For if the thing itself be bad, the
imitation thereof also is bad. And I do not yet say how many adulterers they
make who act these scenes of adultery, how they render the spectators of such
things bold and shameless; for nothing is more full of whoredom and boldness than
an eye that endures to look at such things.
And thou in a market-place wouldest not choose to see a woman stripped
naked, or rather not even in a house, but callest such a thing an outrage. And
goest thou up into the theatre, to insult the common nature of men and women, and
disgrace thine own eyes? For say not this, that she that is stripped is an
harlot; but that the nature is the same, and they are bodies alike, both that of
the harlot, and that of the free-woman. For if this be nothing amiss, what is the
cause that if thou were to see this done in a market place, thou wouldest both
hasten away thyself, and drive thence her who was behaving herself unseemly?
Or is it that when we are apart, then such a thing is outrageous, but when we
are assembled and all sitting together, it is no longer equally shameful? Nay,
this is absurdity and a disgrace, and words of the utmost madness; and it were
better to besmear the eyes all over with mud and mire than to be a spectator of
such a transgression. For surely mire is not so much an hurt to an eye, as an
unchaste sight, and the spectacle of a woman stripped naked. Hear, for example,
what it was that caused nakedness at the beginning, and read the occasion of
such disgrace. What then did cause nakedness? Our disobedience,(1) and the
devil's counsel. Thus, from the first, even from the very beginning, this was his
contrivance. Yet they were at least ashamed when they were naked, but ye take a
pride in it; "having," according to that saying of the apostle, "your glory in
your shame."(2)
How then will thy wife thenceforward look upon thee, when thou art
returned from such wickedness? how receive thee? how speak to thee, after thou hast so
publicly put to shame the common nature of woman, and art made by such a sight
the harlots' captive and slave?(3)
Now if ye grieve at hearing these things, I thank you much, for "who is he
that maketh me glad, but he which is made sorry by me?"(4) Do not then ever
cease to grieve and be vexed for them, for the sorrow that comes of such things
will be to you a beginning of a change for the better. For this cause I also
have made my language the stronger, that by cutting deeper I might free you from
the venom of them that intoxicate you; that I might bring you back to a pure
health of soul; which God grant we may all enjoy by all means, and attain unto
the rewards laid up for these good deeds; by the grace and love towards man of
our Lord Jesus Christ, to whom be glory and dominion forever and ever. Amen.